跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2026/01/100881
CTRI/2026/01/100881尚未招募不适用

COMPARISON OF RYLES TUBE INSERTION TIME USING LMA PROTECTOR VERSUS I-GEL PLUS IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES

Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital,Faridkot1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 64 人开始时间: 2026年2月10日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
64
试验地点
1

研究概览

简要总结

Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly being used as an excellent alternative to mask ventilation and tracheal intubation with fewer complications. The airway devices with gastric access tubes are increasingly being used in surgery requiring general anesthesia and positive airway ventilation. To ensure patient safety it is important that their advantages and limitations must be studied. The hunt is on for a supraglottic airway device that combines the benefits of existing supraglottic airway devices with aspiration protection.

To comparison of time taken in insertion of Ryle’s tube using LMA Protector versus I-gel plus in laparoscopic surgeries.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant and Investigator Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
30.00 Year(s) 至 90.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II.
  • Patient giving valid, informed and written consent.
  • Patients weighting between 50-90Kg posted for elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery under General Anaesthesia.

排除标准

  • Patients having high risk of aspiration (symptomatic gastro-esophageal reflux disease & hiatus hernia).
  • Patients having obstructive sleep apnea.
  • Patients having recent (last 10days) upper respiration tract infection.
  • Patients having previous head & neck surgery or radiotherapy.
  • Patients having restricted mouth opening or anticipated difficult airway.
  • Any facial, laryngeal and pharyngeal anatomy problem.

研究者

发起方
Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital,Faridkot
申办方类型
Government medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Meghna Yadav

Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital,Faridkot

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验