COMPARISON OF RYLES TUBE INSERTION TIME USING LMA PROTECTOR VERSUS I-GEL PLUS IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 64
- 试验地点
- 1
研究概览
简要总结
Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly being used as an excellent alternative to mask ventilation and tracheal intubation with fewer complications. The airway devices with gastric access tubes are increasingly being used in surgery requiring general anesthesia and positive airway ventilation. To ensure patient safety it is important that their advantages and limitations must be studied. The hunt is on for a supraglottic airway device that combines the benefits of existing supraglottic airway devices with aspiration protection.
To comparison of time taken in insertion of Ryle’s tube using LMA Protector versus I-gel plus in laparoscopic surgeries.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- Participant and Investigator Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 30.00 Year(s) 至 90.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II.
- •Patient giving valid, informed and written consent.
- •Patients weighting between 50-90Kg posted for elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery under General Anaesthesia.
排除标准
- •Patients having high risk of aspiration (symptomatic gastro-esophageal reflux disease & hiatus hernia).
- •Patients having obstructive sleep apnea.
- •Patients having recent (last 10days) upper respiration tract infection.
- •Patients having previous head & neck surgery or radiotherapy.
- •Patients having restricted mouth opening or anticipated difficult airway.
- •Any facial, laryngeal and pharyngeal anatomy problem.
研究者
Dr Meghna Yadav
Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital,Faridkot
