跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2021/02/031051
CTRI/2021/02/031051尚未招募不适用

A Randomised comparison of ultrasound- guided versus palpation techniques for Radial artery cannulation by residents in a teaching institution.

Afroz Shahana M Khan1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 124 人开始时间: 2021年2月15日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
124
试验地点
1
主要终点
To study the number of patients whose arterial catheter successfully inserted at the first attempt

研究概览

简要总结

This is a randomized, parallel-group, single-center studycomparing the palpatory method and ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation. The primary outcome will measure the number of patients whose arterial cathetersuccessfully inserted at the first attempt. The secondary outcomes will measurenumber of attempts needed for successful arterial catheter placement in boththe methods, the time required for successful cannulation, the number of sites usedfor successful cannulation, total catheters being used for cannulation, rate ofcomplications and a total number of operators required in both the methods.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Computer generated randomization
盲法
Participant Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
14.00 Year(s) 至 80.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Adult patients undergoing high risk surgeries where invasive BP monitoring is needed.
  • Patients willing to give consent c.
  • Trained postgraduate 3rd year (PGY-3) anesthesiology residents (at least 5 TBP and 5 USG radial arterial catheterizations prior to the study).

排除标准

  • American Society of Anaesthesiologist class V.
  • Patients not willing to give consent.

结局指标

主要结局

To study the number of patients whose arterial catheter successfully inserted at the first attempt

时间窗: At the end of the study i.e 2 months.

次要结局

  • 1. The study the number of attempts needed for successful arterial catheter placement in both the methods.(2. To assess the time required for successful cannulation.)

研究者

发起方
Afroz Shahana M Khan
申办方类型
Other [self]

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验