跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06495086
NCT06495086已完成不适用

A High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Single-blind Randomized Trial

Haseki Training and Research Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 137 人开始时间: 2023年9月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
137
试验地点
2
主要终点
Changes in pH in arterial blood gas before vs. after treatment

研究概览

简要总结

The investigators investigated the efficacy and safety of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) at different flow rates compared to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute exacerbations of Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who did not respond adequately to bronchodilator therapy and continued to exhibit hypercapnic respiratory failure. Specifically, the investigators tested the hypothesis that HFNC would be more effective at reducing partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) levels and hospital stay duration and would be associated with greater patient comfort than NIV.

详细描述

The patients were divided randomly into one of three study groups: NIV, HFNC-30, and HFNC-50. The investigators collected patient data, including demographic characteristics (age and sex), vital signs upon admission (systolic blood pressure [SBP], respiratory rate [RR], and heart rate [HR]), complaints and symptoms upon admission, initial arterial blood gas parameters (e.g., pH, PaCO2, lactate, and bicarbonate), length of stay, ED revisits, patient satisfaction, intubation status, and clinical outcomes (hospitalization, admission to the intensive care unit [ICU], or 28-day mortality). Changes in arterial blood gas parameters (e.g., ΔpH, ΔPaCO2, Δlactate, and Δbicarbonate) before treatment vs. 30, 60, and 120 minutes after treatment were recorded using a pre-prepared case data form.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

In this single-blind study, we assigned the participants randomly to one of three treatment groups using a computer-generated randomization program (SAS Institute, 1990). Each participant was assigned an identification number indicating their treatment group. An experienced clinician, who was blinded to the null hypothesis and did not participate in the evaluation of results, administered the treatments and recorded patient data on a pre-prepared case data form.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • - patients age ≥18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD who presented to the ED with exacerbations that did not respond to bronchodilator therapy

排除标准

  • patients aged younger than 18 years
  • patients had an arterial pH ≤ 7.25;
  • patients were in cardiopulmonary arrest;
  • patients had unstable cardiac arrhythmias or hemodynamic instability;
  • patients showed persistent hypoxemia despite supplemental oxygen therapy;
  • patients were unconscious or uncooperative;
  • patients could not protect their airway or manage secretions;
  • patients had cardiogenic pulmonary edema, active hemoptysis, pneumothorax, recent upper respiratory tract/esophagus surgery, significant airway obstruction (e.g., laryngeal mass or tracheal tumor), active upper gastrointestinal bleeding, or facial trauma or deformities

结局指标

主要结局

Changes in pH in arterial blood gas before vs. after treatment

时间窗: at 30, 60, and 120 minutes relative to baseline

The investigators assessed the changes in pH before treatments vs. 30, 60, and 120 minutes after treatments.

Changes in bicarbonate in arterial blood gas before vs. after treatment

时间窗: at 30, 60, and 120 minutes relative to baseline

The investigators assessed the changes in bicarbonate before treatments vs. 30, 60, and 120 minutes after treatments.

Changes in lactate in arterial blood gas before vs. after treatment

时间窗: at 30, 60, and 120 minutes relative to baseline

The investigators assessed the changes in lactate before treatments vs. 30, 60, and 120 minutes after treatments.

Changes in PaCO2 in arterial blood gas before vs. after treatment

时间窗: at 30, 60, and 120 minutes relative to baseline

The investigators assessed the changes in PaCO2 before treatments vs. 30, 60, and 120 minutes after treatments.

次要结局

  • Assessing the need for rescue treatment and treatment-related complications(120 minutes after initial treatment)

研究者

发起方
Haseki Training and Research Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Adem Az

Principal Investigator

Haseki Training and Research Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验