Comparison of High flow nasal cannula and Non invasive ventilation in type 1 respiratory failure
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/05/067659
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anaesthesiology SMS Medical College
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Patient willing to give consent
Patients having AHRF defined by PaO2/FiO2 less than or equal to 300mmhg
Patient not responding to conventional oxygen therapy
Patient requiring ventilator support due to increased respiratory rate
Exclusion Criteria
Absolute indication for intubation
Contraindication to NIV
PaCO2 more than 45mmhg
Chronic respiratory failure
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To Assess Need for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation In Patients of Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure.Timepoint: until Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.To measure vital parameters (SBP, DBP, MAP, HR, RR, SPO2) <br/ ><br>2.To assess respiratory acidosis by recording ABG. <br/ ><br>3.To assess duration of lCU stay. <br/ ><br>4.To measure hospital mortality. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 1.At admission, 12hours, 24hours,36hours, 72hours <br/ ><br>2.AT 1hour ,6hours ,24hours ,48hours. <br/ ><br>