跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06697171
NCT06697171已完成不适用

The Comparative Effectiveness of Different Conflict-of-interest Disclosures Displayed on Social Media Posts by Registered Dietitians on Public Transparency, Trust and Purchasing Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Experiment

University of Ontario Institute of Technology2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 3,409 人开始时间: 2024年10月28日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
3,409
试验地点
2
主要终点
Conflict of Interest

研究概览

简要总结

There is limited research to inform policies and guidelines related to disclosing conflicts of interest on social media by healthcare professionals, including Registered Dietitians (RDs). This trial investigates mock social media posts by an RD to examine the impact of varying forms of conflict-of-interest (COI) disclosures. The disclosures tested are based on the Canadian Ad Standards "Influencer Marketing Disclosure Guidelines" and are incorporated into recommendations established by the provincial dietetic regulatory bodies for RDs. Specific outcomes evaluated include the public's ability to identify a COI; trust in the RD; credibility of the RD; transparency of the social media post and; purchasing and consumption intentions of the product endorsed by an RD in the post.

详细描述

This study is a randomized controlled experiment embedded within an online cross-sectional survey entitled the Canadian Nutrition and Health Survey (CNHS). A sample of 3,380 Canadian adults from all Canadian provinces (ages ≥18 years, who own a computer, and have an email address) will be recruited by Leger Marketing Inc. as part of the CNHS. Participants will be randomized to one of five experimental groups that include a mock social media post with different variations of COI reporting, based on the Ad Standards (of Canada) Influencer Marketing Disclosure Guidelines. Each participant will be randomized to view one version (group) of the mock Instagram post, all of which feature the same RD promoting the nutritional benefits of a mock soy milk product. Participants will also have the opportunity to view the RD's Instagram account profile, which is consistent across all experimental groups. All participants will have as much time as needed to view the post and account profile.

As stated previously, the experimental groups vary by the extent to which the conflict of interest is reported (see below):

  • Group 1 Not an ad disclosure: COI disclosure includes @brandname and #NotAnAd in the narrative body of the social media post.
  • Group 2 Basic Disclosure: COI disclosure includes @brandname and #ad in the narrative body of the social media post.
  • Group 3 Basic + Paid Partnership Disclosure: COI disclosure accompanied by a branded "paid partnership" in the header and a tag for the industry partner, @brandname and #ad immediately at the beginning of the post, and #ad and #sponsored at the bottom of the narrative body of the social media post.
  • Group 4 Basic + Paid Partnership + Image label: COI disclosure includes the same characteristics as Group 3, with the addition of #ad appearing on the post image itself.
  • Group 5 Control group: is a control with no COI disclosure elements (i.e. no hashtags and only the @brandname included within the narrative body of the social media post).

The primary outcome is the ability of a participant to identify if COI disclosures exist within the social media post. The secondary outcomes include participants' trust in the RD in the social media post, credibility of the RD in the social media post, participants' buying and consumption intentions, and transparency of COI reporting by the RD. Tertiary outcomes include the participants' recommendation of the food item endorsed by the RD to others, participants' engagement with the social media post, and participants' view of the healthfulness of a product endorsed by the RD.

It is hypothesized that, compared to the control condition, participants will rate all experimental conditions as having a conflict of interest. The experimental conditions will be rated more transparent and trustworthy, with the RD in the social media post being rated as more credible, and with greater purchasing/consumption intentions.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Participants are included if:
  • are ≥18 years
  • own a computer,
  • have an email address
  • speak/write in English/French

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Conflict of Interest

时间窗: Measured after 5-10 minutes of exposure to the social media post

Participant identification of COI will be: * Assessed by the statement "I believe the person in the post has a conflict of interest" * Evaluated on a 5-point Likert Scale from Strongly Disagree (1) to Strongly Agree (5). There is no "not applicable" option.

次要结局

  • Trust(Measured after 5-10 minutes of exposure to the social media post)
  • Credibility(Measured after 5-10 minutes of exposure to the social media post)
  • Purchasing Intentions(Measured after 5-10 minutes of exposure to the social media post)
  • Consumption Intentions(Measured after 5-10 minutes of exposure to the social media post)
  • Transparency(Measured after 5-10 minutes of exposure to the social media post)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

JoAnne Arcand

Principal Investigator

University of Ontario Institute of Technology

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验