跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02356380
NCT02356380Unknown不适用

The Effects of Thoracic Spine Mobilizations in Individuals With Neck Pain.

Chatham University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2015年1月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
Neck Pain

研究概览

简要总结

To determine the affects of Physical Therapists clinical reasoning using thoracic spine mobilization for neck pain compared to a standard protocol.

详细描述

The purpose of this research is to compare the effects of two commonly used, safe, thoracic spine treatments: grade 1-4 as performed by Cleland et. al. and grade 1-4 mobilization to the thoracic spine as selected by the Physical Therapist for cervical spine pain. The immediate effects of thoracic spine mobilization have been shown to facilitate greater range of motion increases in the cervical spine and greater pain decreases within a treatment session and on follow-up visits. There is no research utilizing pain threshold perception as an objective outcome of these treatments. Only one study compared the two treatment techniques and concluded that future research should be completed which includes manual therapy for the thoracic spine. (Cleland 2007) If the PT identifies an appropriate patient they will ask if they are interested in being a research subject. The Physical Theapist recruiting subjects all have completed their Doctor of Physical Therapy Degree and have advanced training in manual Physical Therapy. The techniques employed are considered standard practice and are defined as entry level skills by the Comission of Accredicdation of Physical Therapy Programs. These techniques are typically taught in DPT degree programs.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with Neck Pain
  • Ages 18 - 60

排除标准

  • Red flags: leg weakness, night pain, history of cancer, upper motor neuron signs, infection, tumors, osteoporosis, fracture (Boissonnault, 2011) (Cleland, 2004), cervical stenosis, CNS involvement, signs consistent with nerve root compression, previous surgery, pending legal action
  • The inclusion and exclusion above represent a conservative approach based on combining criteria of recent studies in published review articles. (Cross, 2011; Walser, 2009

结局指标

主要结局

Neck Pain

时间窗: 2 weeks

0-10 scale

Neck Disability Index

时间窗: 2 weeks

Assessment of function of neck using a valid and reliable written tool.

Global Rating of Change

时间窗: 2 weeks

A written scale assessing overall improvement

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Steve Karas

Assistant Professor

Chatham University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验