跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03310554
NCT03310554Unknown不适用

Prevention of Duodenobiliary Reflux Via Suspended Overlength Biliary Stents in Patients With Biliary Stricture

Peking University Third Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 117 人开始时间: 2018年1月11日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
117
试验地点
1
主要终点
stent patency and stent occlusion rate

研究概览

简要总结

Endoscopic insertion of plastic or metal stents in bile duct under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a well established treatment of distal malignant biliary obstruction.Biliary stents are widely used to relieve symptoms of malignant biliary stricture.Now, the mainly used biliary stents include plastic and metal stents. The main limitation of long time plastic stents is stents occlusion. Biliary plastic stents are changed every 2 to 3 months due to an expected median patency from 77 to 126 days.Metal stents present a lower risk of recurring biliary occlusion, yet high cost and stents occlusion are eventually inevitable. The mechanism of biliary stents occlusion include biliary sluge of the accumulation of bacteria and duodenal biliary reflux .The anti-reflux barrier of Oddi's sphincter disappears after the insertion of biliary stents and the presure in bile duct lowers the duodenals, which cause the retrograde flow of duodenal material into the biliary ducts. Besides, ordinary biliary plastic stent is short which can also shortens the length of duodenal biliary reflux . Therefore, trying to prevent the duodenal biliary reflux is very important in reducing biliary stents occlusion and it is gradually concerned by clinical researchers. Some studies have showed that plastic stents with antireflux valves can effectively reduce the biliary stent stricture and prolong the stents patency, which means reducing duodenobiliary reflux is surely useful for keeping biliary stent patency.So,we assume to explore an innovatively suspended overlength biliary stents (made from nasobiliary tube with length of 26cm or 30cm) as substitution for ordinary biliary plastic stent to prevent the duodenobiliary reflux by extending the length of duodenal content reflux and avoid the stents shift via suspending in intrahepatic duct. In this study,we will design a randomized controlled trial to compare the patency of different length of suspended overlength biliary stents and ordinary plastic biliary stents in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction to evaluate the effect and safety of suspended overlength biliary stents for the prevention of duodenobiliary reflux and the effect of different length of the stents.

详细描述

Endoscopic insertion of plastic or metal stents in bile duct under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a well established treatment of distal malignant biliary obstruction.Biliary stents are widely used to relieve symptoms of malignant biliary stricture.Now, the mainly used biliary stents include plastic and metal stents. The main limitation of long time plastic stents is stents occlusion. Biliary plastic stents are changed every 2 to 3 months due to an expected median patency from 77 to 126 days.Metal stents present a lower risk of recurring biliary occlusion, yet high cost and stents occlusion are eventually inevitable. The mechanism of biliary stents occlusion include biliary sluge of the accumulation of bacteria and duodenal biliary reflux .The anti-reflux barrier of Oddi's sphincter disappears after the insertion of biliary stents and the presure in bile duct lowers the duodenals, which cause the retrograde flow of duodenal material into the biliary ducts. Besides, ordinary biliary plastic stent is short which can also shortens the length of duodenal biliary reflux . Therefore, trying to prevent the duodenal biliary reflux is very important in reducing biliary stents occlusion and it is gradually concerned by clinical researchers. Some studies have showed that plastic stents with antireflux valves can effectively reduce the biliary stent stricture and prolong the stents patency, which means reducing duodenobiliary reflux is surely useful for keeping biliary stent patency .So,we assume to explore an innovatively suspended overlength biliary stents (made from nasobiliary tube with length of 26cm or 30cm) as substitution for ordinary biliary plastic stent to prevent the duodenobiliary reflux by extending the length of duodenal content reflux and avoid the stents shift via suspending in intrahepatic duct. In this study,we will design a randomized controlled trial to compare the patency of different length of suspended overlength biliary stents and ordinary plastic biliary stents in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction to evaluate the effect and safety of suspended overlength biliary stents for the prevention of duodenobiliary reflux and the effect of different length of the stents.

The investigators will recruit patients according to admission criteria and exclusion criteria. Eligible patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction will be randomly divided into 26cm suspended overlength biliary stents group (experimental group) 、30cm suspended overlength biliary stents group (experimental group) and ordinary plastic biliary stents group (control group).The test groups will be placed the 26cm or 30cm suspended overlength biliary stents in introhepatic bile duct in ERCP. The control group will be placed ordinary plastic biliary stents in ERCP. The primary endpoint is the duration of stent patency and the rate of stent occlusion.The secondary outcomes include the mortality of each group, adverse events and the rate of technical success.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Blinding of endoscopists and patients is impossible.But the endoscopists are not involved in the assessment of outcomes. The outcomes assessments are performed by reviewing physicians blinded to the randomization process. The data manager and statistician are not blinded.

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Unresectable extrahepatic malignant biliary stricture,available for insertion of biliary stents in ERCP to alleviate biliary stricture.

排除标准

  • •Patients agree with metal biliary stents;
  • •Patients with biliary stricture need double or multiple stents inserted;
  • •Patients with previous surgical drainage procedure;
  • •Patients with resectable biliary occlusion;
  • •A guidewire could not be passed through the stricture;
  • •Patients with duodenal obstruction and duodenal endoscopy could not be reached to papillary.;
  • •Patients with any contraindication to endoscopic procedures or refuse informed consent

研究组 & 干预措施

ordinary plastic biliary stents group

Other

干预措施: ordinary plastic biliary stents (Procedure)

26cm suspended overlength biliary stents group

Experimental

干预措施: 26cm suspended overlength biliary stents (Procedure)

30cm suspended overlength biliary stents group

Experimental

干预措施: 30cm suspended overlength biliary stents (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

stent patency and stent occlusion rate

时间窗: 12 months after ERCP

Patients with symptoms of cholangitis and worsening liver function tests suggestive of cholestasis are considered as premature stent occlusion.

次要结局

  • adverse events(12 months after ERCP)
  • the rate of technical success(12 months after ERCP)
  • mortality of each group(12 months after ERCP)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Huang Yonghui

Chief physician

Peking University Third Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验