跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01202162
NCT01202162已完成不适用

A Comparison of Desflurane vs. Sevoflurane on Time to Awakening and the Incidence and Severity of Cough After Ambulatory Surgery Using Laryngeal Mask Airway

Northwestern University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 85 人开始时间: 2010年2月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
85
试验地点
1
主要终点
Time to Awakening

研究概览

简要总结

Goals for ambulatory surgery include providing optimal surgical conditions while ensuring a rapid early recovery without side effect. Dexter et al1 concluded in a meta-analysis that Desflurane can reduce the extubation time when compared to Sevoflurane. This potential benefit of Desflurane can be especially attractive in short ambulatory cases performed with general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway.

Although some studies have not shown a difference on perioperative cough and laryngospasm between Desflurane and Sevoflurane at clinically relevant doses.It has been reported in the literature that Desflurane causes cough4 and many providers avoid using Desflurane with a LMA (laryngeal mask airway) in the ambulatory setting. In this study we will also evaluate, as a secondary outcome, the presence and severity of perioperative cough and laryngospasm.

Previous investigators have demonstrated a more rapid resumption of normal daily activities after ambulatory surgery in patients anesthetized with Desflurane when compared with Sevoflurane.these investigators suggested a better quality of recovery when Desflurane is used probably due to a lower lipid solubility of Desflurane. We will also evaluate quality of recovery as a secondary outcome using a validated instrument.

Significance:

  1. A more rapid awakening, especially, in a fast and high turnover cases that are performed with LMA can lead to a more cost effective utilization of operating room time
  2. It has been reported that Desflurane causes more cough than Sevoflurane and Anesthesiologists avoid using Desflurane with LMA cases, this study will reinforce that there is no difference.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 18-65
  • Female patients undergoing outpatient gynecologic and breast surgery
  • Under general anesthesia using an LMA
  • ASA I,II,

排除标准

  • Patients on CNS depressants
  • Chronic opioid use
  • Corticosteroid
  • Pregnant patients
  • Full stomach
  • Morbidly obese (BMI >35kg/m2)
  • Hepatitis B
  • Hepatitis C
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Liver disease
  • Renal disease
  • Seizure disorder
  • Dropout criteria:
  • Need for endotracheal tube
  • Surgeon or patient request
  • Hospital admission

研究组 & 干预措施

Desflurane

Active Comparator

Administration of Desflurane

干预措施: Desflurane (Drug)

Sevoflurane

Active Comparator

Administration of Sevoflurane

干预措施: Administration of Sevoflurane (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Time to Awakening

时间窗: Time inhalational agent is turned off to time of patient awakening

次要结局

  • Number of Participants Who Coughed(Perioperative)
  • Quality of Recovery 40(1 day)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Gildasio De Oliveira

Principal Investigator

Northwestern University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

A Comparison of Desflurane vs. Sevoflurane and the... | 临床试验