Assessment of Quality of Life in Women With Normogonadotropic Anovulation
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 300
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Physical functioning
研究概览
简要总结
Among the causes of ovulation disorders (group II of anovulation according to the World Health Organization classification), the dominant one is polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and the remaining cases are classified as Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Ovarian Axis Dysfunction (HPOD). The exact etiology of both entities is unknown. To diagnose PCOS, the Rotterdam criteria must be met and other conditions that may cause hyperandrogenism or ovulation disorders must be excluded. PCOS is more often accompanied by other endocrine and metabolic disorders, such as obesity, dyslipidemia, hyperandrogenism, insulin resistance, diabetes, hyperprolactinemia and thyroid diseases, as well as infertility due to ovulation defect. These conditions not only significantly reduce quality of life (QoL), but also lead to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, adverse obstetric outcomes and an increased risk of endometrial cancer, further impairing QoL.
详细描述
A prospective questionnaire study will be conducted regarding the quality of life among women undergoing hormonal diagnostics due to anovulation. The study will include women aged 18-45 with ovulation disorders: PCOS (arm 1) and HPOD (arm 2). The quality of life will be assessed using the self-assessment method using the SF-36 questionnaire (Short Form Health Survey). The questionnaire is intended for a subjective assessment of health status. It consists of 11 questions containing 36 statements that allow you to determine eight quality of life indicators, i.e.: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain, general health, health change.
The percentage score on a scale of 0-100% in each of the 8 life domains will be compared between both arms of the study.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 45 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •menstrual cycle length <21 days or >35 days
- •age 18-45 years
排除标准
- •previous ovarian surgery
结局指标
主要结局
Physical functioning
时间窗: 12 months
Comparison of physical functioning percentage score between both study arms on a scale from 0 to 100%, where 0% is the lowest result (the worst quality of life) and 100% is the maximum result (the best quality of life)
General health perceptions
时间窗: 12 months
Comparison of general health perceptions percentage score between both study arms on a scale from 0 to 100%, where 0% is the lowest result (the worst quality of life) and 100% is the maximum result (the best quality of life)
Emotional well-being
时间窗: 12 months
Comparison of emotional well-being percentage score between both study arms on a scale from 0 to 100%, where 0% is the lowest result (the worst quality of life) and 100% is the maximum result (the best quality of life)
Role limitations due to physical health problems
时间窗: 12 months
Comparison of role limitations due to physical health problems percentage score between both study arms on a scale from 0 to 100%, where 0% is the lowest result (the worst quality of life) and 100% is the maximum result (the best quality of life)
Bodily pain
时间窗: 12 months
Comparison of bodily pain percentage score between both study arms on a scale from 0 to 100%, where 0% is the lowest result (the worst quality of life) and 100% is the maximum result (the best quality of life)
Role limitations due to personal or emotional problems
时间窗: 12 months
Comparison of role limitations due to personal or emotional problems score between both study arms on a scale from 0 to 100%, where 0% is the lowest result (the worst quality of life) and 100% is the maximum result (the best quality of life)
Social functioning
时间窗: 12 months
Comparison of social functioning percentage score between both study arms on a scale from 0 to 100%, where 0% is the lowest result (the worst quality of life) and 100% is the maximum result (the best quality of life)
Energy/fatigue
时间窗: 12 months
Comparison of energy/fatigue percentage score between both study arms on a scale from 0 to 100%, where 0% is the lowest result (the worst quality of life) and 100% is the maximum result (the best quality of life)
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Iwona Magdalena Gawron
PhD, MD
Jagiellonian University