跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03420495
NCT03420495已完成不适用

Decision-making Impairments in OCD: An Integrated Behavioral Economics Model

Massachusetts General Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 69 人开始时间: 2018年5月3日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
69
试验地点
1
主要终点
Ambiguity aversion score on the Risk and Ambiguity Task

研究概览

简要总结

The investigators are examining whether conditions of ambiguity during decision-making may prime intolerance of uncertainty beliefs (i.e., difficulties coping with ambiguity, unpredictability, and the future) and lead to impaired performance when individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are making uncertain decisions compared to non-psychiatric controls.

详细描述

The primary aims of this study are to examine the extent to which individuals with OCD avoid decisions that involve ambiguity through the use of self-report and behavioral measures. Specifically, the investigators will examine how individuals with OCD minimize risk at the expense of monetary profit under conditions of ambiguity (relative to risky but unambiguous options) compared to non-psychiatric controls utilizing a series of judgment and decision-making (JDM) tasks.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adults (age 18+)
  • Meet DSM-5 criteria for principal OCD (OCD group) or no current DSM-5 diagnosis (NPC group).
  • Sufficient fluency of English to understand study procedures and questionnaires
  • Ability to provide informed consent.
  • Comfortable and capable of using a computer to complete computer-based decision-making tasks.

排除标准

  • Color-blindness (which prevents completion of certain tasks)
  • Acute psychosis, bipolar disorder, substance use disorder, or suicidality. All other diagnostic comorbidities will be permitted to foster the accrual of a clinically relevant sample.
  • Serious neurological disorder or impairment (e.g., brain damage, blindness), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), intellectual disability, or autism.

研究组 & 干预措施

OCD Group

Experimental

Meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria for principal OCD. These participants will complete clinician interviews, self-report questionnaires, and receive the Decision-Making Tasks Intervention.

干预措施: Decision-Making Tasks (Behavioral)

Non-psychiatric Control Group

Experimental

No current DSM-5 diagnosis. These participants will also complete clinician interviews, self-report questionnaires, and receive the Decision-Making Tasks Intervention.

干预措施: Decision-Making Tasks (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Ambiguity aversion score on the Risk and Ambiguity Task

时间窗: Day 1

In the Risk and Ambiguity Task participants make repeated choices between a certain payoff vs. a gamble. On low ambiguity trials, the likelihood of the gamble is known (i.e., "risky" lottery). On high ambiguity trials, the likelihood of the gamble is unknown (i.e., "ambiguous" lottery). Ambiguity aversion = (number of 50% risky lotteries chosen / total number of 50% risky lotteries) - (# of ambiguous lotteries chosen / total number of ambiguous lotteries).

Average adjusted pump scores on the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART)

时间窗: Day 1

In the BART participants blow up a series of virtual balloons. With each pump: (a) they earn 5 cents that accumulate in a temporary reserve, but (b) the likelihood of the balloon exploding increases. When this occurs participants lose the money in their temporary reserve. At any time, participants can choose to transfer their earnings to a permanent savings bank (and move to the next balloon). Thus, participants weigh the likelihood of the negative outcome (i.e., the balloon exploding and losing money) with the potential gains (i.e., 5 cents per pump). In the low ambiguity version of the task, the likelihood of the balloon exploding is known. In the high ambiguity version, the likelihood of the balloon exploding is unknown. The average adjusted pump score = average number of pumps on trials in which the balloons did not explode.

次要结局

  • Money spent on draws to decision (DTD) in the Beads Task(Day 1)
  • Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS-12)(Day 1)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Ryan Jane Jacoby

Ryan Jane Jacoby, Ph.D., Clinical Psychologist, OCD and Related Disorders Program

Massachusetts General Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Decision-making Impairments in OCD: An Integrated... | 临床试验