Comparison of High and Low Pulse Energy Dusting Protocols Using Holmium: YAG-laser in Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones Treatment
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 160
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Stone free rates
研究概览
简要总结
Rcompare high-energy versus low-energy laser settings in renal stone lithotripsy using low power machines) Holmium YAG 30 watts, examining their respective advantages, limitations, and overall efficacy.
详细描述
The prevalence of urinary stone disease treatment has shown a continuous updating Within the armamentarium of urinary stone management, the laser has emerged as a cornerstone for lithotripsy in endourological procedures. The laser technology has witnessed a progressive evolution, transitioning from the established holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser with pulse modulation to the advent of thulium fiber laser (TFL) and, more recently, the innovative pulsed thulium:YAG (p-Tm:YAG) laser Laser lithotripsy is prefered for its minimally invasive approach and high success rates in fragmenting stones, yet the ongoing debate continues regarding the optimal laser power settings for this procedure. contemporary approaches in laser lithotripsy focus on two primary strategies: fragmenting stones into smaller retrievable parts or breaking them into minute fragments, commonly referred to as 'dust,' facilitating the natural passage of smaller particles The choice between high power and low power settings in laser lithotripsy significantly influences treatment outcomes, including stone fragmentation efficiency, procedural time, and potential tissue damage. High-energy power laser settings offer rapid stone ablation capabilities, enabling quick fragmentation but potentially raising concerns about thermal injury to surrounding tissues. In contrast, low-energy power settings, while reducing the risk of tissue damage, might prolong the procedure and necessitate additional maneuvers for complete stone clearance This study aims to compare high-energy versus low-energy laser settings in renal stone lithotripsy using low power machines) Holmium YAG 30 watts, examining their respective advantages, limitations, and overall efficacy. By scrutinizing existing literature and recent studies, this study intends to provide a 56 comprehensive understanding of the clinical implications of choosing optimal laser settings in urolithiasis comprehensive understanding of the clinical implications of choosing optimal laser settings in urolithiasis.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •adult patients
- •hard renal stones
- •less than 2 cm
- •Hounsfield unit of ≥ 1000
排除标准
- •Patients less than 18 years
- •ureteral stones
- •stones with Hounsfield units less than 1000
- •stones in calyceal diverticulum
- •patients with coagulopathy were also excluded from the study.
结局指标
主要结局
Stone free rates
时间窗: One year
Assess stone free rate between two different setting
次要结局
- Preoperative complications(One year)
研究者
Hossam Kandeel
Director
Menoufia University
