跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2018/09/015783
CTRI/2018/09/015783已完成2 期

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF USE OF EXTERNAL OBLIQUE APONEUROSIS FOR STRENGTHENING OF POSTERIOR WALL OF INGUINAL CANAL(NO MESH DESARDAS TECHNIQUE) VS CONVENTIONAL HERNIA REPAIR WITH MESH (LICHENSTEINS REPAIR)

KIMS Hospital and Research CEntre0 个研究点目标入组 123 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
123

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

入选标准

  • All cases of inguinal hernia admitted for surgery
  • Above 18 years of age.
  • 2. With a primary, reducible inguinal or inguino-scrotal hernia; unilateral or bilateral

排除标准

  • Patients with:
  • 1. Obstructive uropathy or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease- because they are contraindications to elective hernia surgery. They are associated with definite poor outcomes such as high recurrence rates.
  • 2. Old and debilitated patients of poor general condition as they will be unable to give an accurate assessment of the
  • key outcomes of the operation.
  • 3. Patients with strangulated hernia.
  • 4. Recurrent Hernias.
  • 5. Per operative finding of seperated,thin and/or weak external oblique aponeurosis

研究者

发起方
KIMS Hospital and Research CEntre

相似试验