跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02890433
NCT02890433已完成不适用

Are Standard Precautions as Efficient as Contact Additional Precautions Against the Transmission of Multi-drug Resistant Bacteria in Intensive Care Unit ?

Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 3,124 人开始时间: 2015年6月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
3,124
试验地点
1
主要终点
Rate of Meticillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) and Enterobacteriaceae producing Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (EESBL) per 1000 hospitalization days

研究概览

简要总结

The national recommendations promote the applying of the Contact Additional Precautions (CAP) with the Standard Precautions (SP) to limit the transmission of multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria. However, that could entail more costs and a reduction of quality of the patient care.

详细描述

The national recommendations promote the applying of the Contact Additional Precautions (CAP) with the Standard Precautions (SP) to limit the transmission of multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria. However, that could entail more costs and a reduction of quality of the patient care.

This study seeks showing it in way of a non-interventional research in a resuscitation unit. Two periods are compared for noticing the rates of MDR bacteria contaminations.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • hospitalization in resuscitation unit

排除标准

  • opposition for gathering data

结局指标

主要结局

Rate of Meticillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) and Enterobacteriaceae producing Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (EESBL) per 1000 hospitalization days

时间窗: 1000 days

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验