跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04920318
NCT04920318招募中不适用

Enhancing Language Function in Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

University of Arizona1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2021年8月30日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
20
试验地点
1
主要终点
Mean change from baseline scores on the Arizona Phonological Battery

研究概览

简要总结

This study's goal is to use non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS) techniques to treat language impairment associated with Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). The purpose of this study is to combine behavioral language intervention with individualized noninvasive brain stimulation techniques, called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to help the brain reorganize around damage and improve language functions.

详细描述

Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disorder that selectively affects language comprehension and/or production, with initial preservation of other cognitive domains. As tDCS has not been extensively studied in PPA, the investigators will measure both short- and long-term effects of stimulation in patients with this neurodegenerative disorder that affects specific language regions. Previous research suggests that neurostimulation with tDCS can safely induce changes in neural plasticity that can lead to long-term restoration of synaptic function. Thus, individually targeted stimulation to structurally preserved but dysfunctional regions may be able to produce behavioral improvements in primary progressive aphasia (PPA).

TDCS is a method of stimulating the brain that does not require any sedation or surgery. TDCS is a technique that sends a weak electrical current through the scalp to stimulate the brain areas below. The information gained from this research study will aid in the development of therapies to improve language in people with neurological conditions that affect language use.

TDCS will be applied over the activated area identified with the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) fMRI-localizer task. This approach will allow for individually optimized tDCS electrode placement. It will also account for potential inter-participant variability in the brain atrophy and language organization

Summary of study sequence and procedures:

Week 1: Baseline screening, language testing, one event-related brain potential (EEG-ERP) session Weeks 2: fMRI session to determine most effective treatment Weeks 3-4: tDCS with Language Treatment Part 1 Weeks 5 and 6: rest-period, post-treatment assessment Weeks 7 to 8: TDCS with Language Treatment Part 2 Weeks 9 and 10: rest period, post-treatment assessment 2-month follow-up, language assessment, one MRI scan, one EEG-ERP session

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)

盲法说明

The subject codes will be used for blinding of the participants, care-providers, and speech-language therapist administering the treatment.

入排标准

年龄范围
45 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •diagnosed with PPA by neurologist or speech-language pathologist
  • •speech-language deficit arising from PPA
  • •native speaker of English Language or equivalent
  • •adequate vision (normal or corrected to normal)
  • •adequate hearing

排除标准

  • •meeting (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) DSM-IV criteria for Axis I mood, anxiety, psychotic or substance abuse disorders.
  • •highly magnetizable metallic implants, including certain dental work
  • •neurological disorders besides the ones of interest for the study (e.g., epilepsy)
  • •Multiple Sclerosis
  • •Parkinson's Disease
  • •contraindications for MRI
  • •pacemakers
  • •metallic cardiac pumps
  • •magnetic materials such as surgical clips, implanted electronic perfusion pumps, or any other condition that would preclude proximity to a strong magnetic field.
  • •clinically significant claustrophobia
  • •severe systemic disease (e.g., renal failure)
  • •poor health
  • •pregnancy
  • •epileptic activity in the past 12 months
  • •family history of epilepsy or other seizure disorders
  • •brain surgery in the past
  • •metallic skull plates or implants
  • •skin lesions or skull damage
  • •excessive use of alcohol or drugs
  • •premorbid psychiatric disease affecting communication
  • •severe non-linguistic cognitive disturbances impeding language therapy

研究组 & 干预措施

active TDCS

Experimental

During intervention excitatory/anodal tDCS will be administered alongside speech-language therapy 5 days a week for 2 weeks. The exact location of the stimulation and electrode configuration will be targeted individually based on the optimal site identified in fMRI. TDCS will be administered with NeurConn1 Channel DC- Stimulator Plus (neuroCare Group, München, Germany) according to established guidelines and procedures. The active tDCS will be delivered for 20 minutes using sponge electrodes with a 30-s ramp-up and ramp-down period

干预措施: tDCS + language therapy (Combination Product)

sham TDCS

Sham Comparator

The sham will be administered alongside speech-language therapy 5 days a week for 2 weeks. For sham, stimulation will be ramped up and then down to 0 milliamperes (mA) in the first minute of stimulation. The sham parameters were chosen based on previous reports that the perceived sensations on the skin, such as tingling, fade out in the first 30 s of tDCS

干预措施: sham TDCS + language therapy (Combination Product)

结局指标

主要结局

Mean change from baseline scores on the Arizona Phonological Battery

时间窗: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Mean change from baseline scores on the Arizona Phonological Battery: Minimum score = 0; maximum = 100%; higher scores indicate better outcome

Mean change from baseline scores on the language probe task before and after each session

时间窗: through study completion, an average of 1 year

change on on the probe task from before the session; Min =0; Max = 100%; higher scores indicate better outcome

Mean change from baseline scores on the naming task

时间窗: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Mean change from baseline scores on the Boston Naming Test: Min score = 0; Max = 60; higher scores indicate better outcome

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验