跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05501782
NCT05501782Unknown不适用

Evaluation of Intuitive Eating and Hedonic Hunger Status and the Effects of Intuitive Eating and Hedonic Deficit on Body Mass Index, Mental Health and Sleep Quality in University Students.

Istanbul Medeniyet University0 个研究点目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2022年9月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
100
主要终点
Power of food scale (PFS)

研究概览

简要总结

This study was conducted with the participation of 62 female and 38 male students between the ages of 18-36 studying at various universities. A questionnaire consisting of seven parts was applied to the participants. In the first part, 20; demographic data and general health status of the participants; There were 11 questions including nutritional habits and anthropometric measurements (body weight and height). The other parts of the questionnaire were the Intuitive Eating Scale (IES-2), Power of Food Scale (PFS-Tr), Food Craving Questionnaire (FCQ-T), the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Scale (PUKI), Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) and Palatable Eating Motive Scale (PEMS), respectively contains. Consent from the participants was also obtained with the questionnaire form.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Crossover
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 36 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • University students who agreed to participate in the study

排除标准

  • University students who did not want to participate in the study baby and kids elderly adolescents pregnant women breastfeeding mothers

结局指标

主要结局

Power of food scale (PFS)

时间窗: 2 months

Power of food scale (PFS) is a scale developed to evaluate the effects of palatable foods on the psychological and hedonic states of individuals. The Turkish version with a reliability study was used in this study (PFS-Tr) A validated version of this scale consisting of 15 items was used. The scale was evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale. Accordingly, I strongly disagree 1 point, I disagree 2 points, I am undecided 3 points, I agree 4 points, and I strongly agree 5 points. The scores obtained from all items were divided into five and the scale score was found. It was concluded that the hedonic hunger levels of individuals with a nutritional power score of 2.5 and above increased. It has been accepted that individuals with a high score are sensitive to the food environment and psychologically under the influence of food

Intuitive eating scale (IES-2)

时间窗: 2 months

Intuitive eating scale (IES-2) consists of 23 questions, each of which includes five options ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. A 5-point Likert scale was used in the scale. In 1,2,3,7,8,9,10 questions, strongly disagree 5, disagree 4, undecided 3, agree 2 and strongly agree 1 point. The scoring of the answers to the other questions is in the opposite order (strongly disagree 1, disagree 2, undecided 3, agree 4, and strongly agree 5 points). The scale score was calculated by dividing the total score obtained at the end of the questions by 23. Intuitive eating behavior also increases in parallel with the increase in the scale score. The median values of the Intuitive Eating Scores of the students participating in the study were found. Participants with a scale score below the median value were considered as having no intuitive eating behavior, and participants with a median value and above were considered individuals with intuitive eating behavior

Food Craving Questionnaire (FCQ)

时间窗: 2 months

Food Craving Questionnaire (FCQ) is a scale developed for the assessment of food cravings. The Turkish version with a reliability study was used in this study (FCQ-T). In this scale, evaluation is made with a 6-point Likert scale. It was scored always 6 points, mostly 5 points, often 4 points, occasionally 3 points, rarely 2 points, never 1 point. High scale scores of the participants indicate an increase in food cravings

Pittsburg Sleep Quality Scale (PUKI)

时间窗: 2 months

Pittsburg Sleep Quality Scale (PUKI) is a scale developed to evaluate sleep quality. This scale includes 18 items with 7 components. These components are subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, use of sleep medication, and daytime sleep dysfunction. Each component is scored between 0-3 points, with a maximum total score of 21. A total score of 5 or more indicates poor sleep quality, and an increase in the score indicates a decrease in sleep quality

Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS)

时间窗: 2 months

the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS), whose reliability study was conducted, was used. The scale consists of 14 questions and is evaluated with a 5-point Likert scale. It is scored as 1 point to strongly disagree, 2 points to disagree, 3 points to slightly agree, 4 points to agree and 5 points to completely agree. The total score on the scale is between 14 and 70. The increase in the total score indicates that the mental well-being of the individual increases.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Istanbul Medeniyet University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Gülin Öztürk Özkan

Head of department (PhD) Assistant Professor

Istanbul Medeniyet University

相似试验