跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04932993
NCT04932993撤回不适用

Writing Down Goals

University of Texas at Austin0 个研究点目标入组 128 人开始时间: 2025年9月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
入组人数
128
主要终点
Decision conflict questionnaire

研究概览

简要总结

The women's health IPU at UT Health Austin is happy with having patients write down their goals at their first visit and then tracking those. It would be interesting to study people seeking musculoskeletal specialty care to determine whether asking patients what result of their care would be rated a success helps direct the clinician-patient interaction in a more fruitful direction compared to the usual clinical interaction.

详细描述

People's stated preferences are often inconsistent with what matters most to them (their values). And they are often based on misconceptions, distress, and less effective cognitive coping strategies. For instance, a person might say "My goal is to have no pain" when that is not possible. Or they might say "My goal is to get the shot that fixes this" when there is no such shot. It may go without saying that people want: "To be able to live a normal lifestyle" and "To be able to accomplish most of their goals." In other words, people want to be able to be themselves. They are seeking care because they are not able to be themselves or they are concerned that they may not be able to be themselves. The word health comes from an old German word meaning "whole."

One part of good health is correcting or alleviating pathophysiology (e.g. reading glasses). Another part of good health is evolving one's inner narrative (e.g. "I'm older now and need glasses to read").

The women's health IPU at UT Health Austin is happy with having patients write down their goals at their first visit and then tracking those. It would be interesting to study people seeking musculoskeletal specialty care to determine whether asking patients what result of their care would be rated a success helps direct the clinician-patient interaction in a more fruitful direction compared to the usual clinical interaction.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 89 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adult patients (18+)
  • Orthopedic visit

排除标准

  • Patients who are illiterate.
  • Patients who do not speak English.

结局指标

主要结局

Decision conflict questionnaire

时间窗: Baseline

Questionnaire assessing decision conflict

次要结局

  • Patient Activation Measure-13(Baseline)
  • Guttman Satisfaction scale(Baseline)
  • Jefferson Scale of Patient's Perceptions of Physician Empathy(Baseline)
  • Decision regret questionnaire(Baseline)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

David Ring

David Ring, MD, PhD Associate Dean for Comprehensive Care, Professor of Surgery and Psychiatry

University of Texas at Austin

相似试验