跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07532616
NCT07532616Enrolling By Invitation不适用

Comparing the Effectiveness of Evidence-Based Steps and Generative AI in Promoting Students' Development of Ultimate Concern Care Strategies: Challenges and Reflections on Meta-Cognition

Chung Shan Medical University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 110 人开始时间: 2025年9月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
Enrolling By Invitation
入组人数
110
试验地点
1
主要终点
metacognitive self-regulated learning ability

研究概览

简要总结

Teaching intervention

详细描述

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of evidence-based steps and generative AI in promoting students' development of ultimate concern care strategies. The indicators used to measure variables included metacognitive self-regulated learning ability, teamwork, and self-efficacy in learning and performance

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • student over 20 years old

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

To compare the effectiveness of evidence-based steps and generative AI in promoting students' develo

Experimental

干预措施: Teaching (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

metacognitive self-regulated learning ability

时间窗: Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.

A 12-item metacognitive self-regulated learning ability scale was used to assess students' metacognitive self-regulated learning ability. The scale encompasses the planning, monitoring, and regulation of cognitive self-regulation activities and employs a 7-point scoring system, with higher scores indicating stronger metacognitive self-regulated learning ability.

teamwork

时间窗: Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.

The peer learning subscale uses a 3-question scale with a 7-point scoring system; higher scores indicate better teamwork.

self-efficacy

时间窗: Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.

The Learning and Performance Self-Efficacy Scale was used to assess students' learning self-efficacy. The scale consists of 8 questions and uses a 7-point scoring system; higher scores indicate better learning efficacy.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Hsiang Chu Pai

professor

Chung Shan Medical University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验