跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2023/06/053790
CTRI/2023/06/053790已完成不适用

Pericapsular nerve group block versus Suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for analgesia during positioning for spinal anaesthesia in patients with hip fracture : an observational study.

Dr Sinyo Kashung1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 70 人开始时间: 2023年6月20日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
70
试验地点
1
主要终点
To compare the analgesia 30 minutes after the block in terms of numeric rating score at :

研究概览

简要总结

Spinal anaesthesia is considered as the gold standard for hip surgeries. However severe pain is encountered during positioning of the patients especially for the commonly used hyperbaric spinal. Parenteral opioids, NSAIDS as well as regional nerve blocks like femoral 3 in 1, fascia iliaca blocks etc are being employed  to facilitate patient positioning. Good analgesia during positioning reduces the patient’s suffering, decreases incidence of post traumatic stress, and also makes the procedure easy for the Anaesthesiologist.The Pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) and Suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFI-B) are recently  introduced blocks for positioning pain.

Girón-Arango et al. introduced a new technique,pericapsular nerve group block (PENG), for  selective blockade of the articular branches from the femoral, accessory obturator, and obturator nerve. It has demonstrated sufficient analgesic effect and without any quadriceps weakness in patients with hip fracture.The fascia iliaca block has shown good analgesic efficacy for hip fracture patients with the suprainguinal  approach showing superior results than the infrainguinal approach, due to better spread of local anaesthetic under the fascia iliaca.

These nerve group blocks provides an opportunity for anaesthesiologists to participate in patient’s pain control early on, especially in terms of offering analgesia for effective pain control. The nerve blocks provide superior analgesia with decreased use of opioids and various other benefits. Regional analgesia with neuraxial anesthesia for hip fracture surgery has a multitude of benefits with positive outcomes and will play a major role in pain and perioperative management in the future.

Due to the limited literature comparing newer nerve group blocks i.e. PENG and SIFI-B, we decided to conduct the study.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational

入排标准

年龄范围
40.00 Year(s) 至 75.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • ASA Status I and II
  • weight 45-70 kg
  • Height 150- 170 cm.

排除标准

  • Patient’s refusal to participate
  • Any contraindications to spinal anaesthesia or peripheral nerve block
  • Past history of drug allergy
  • Liver failure
  • Renal insufficiency
  • Known or suspected coagulopathy
  • Pre-existing neurologic or anatomic deficit in the lower extremities
  • Cognitive impairment with difficulties in pain evaluation
  • Severe psychiatric illness.

结局指标

主要结局

To compare the analgesia 30 minutes after the block in terms of numeric rating score at :

时间窗: 30 minutes after the block.

1. Rest

时间窗: 30 minutes after the block.

2. Passive 15 degree limb elevation

时间窗: 30 minutes after the block.

3. Positioning for spinal anaesthesia

时间窗: 30 minutes after the block.

次要结局

  • To measure :(1. Time taken for execution of block)

研究者

发起方
Dr Sinyo Kashung
申办方类型
Other [self]

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验