Large-scale Online Studies of Motor Responses and Cognition
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 2,529
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- data analysis
研究概览
简要总结
Background:
Our goal is to gain insight into early human motor skill learning by carrying out online substudies using online crowd-sourcing tools.
Objective:
To learn more about motor behavior in a large group of people using motor tasks, and questions.
Eligibility:
Adults ages 18 and older based in the U.S. who speak English
Design:
Participants will be recruited from a crowd-sourcing website like Amazon Mechanical Turk.
Participants will do online tasks. They can use their own computers anywhere with Internet access. They will not need to directly interact with researchers.
Participants will be asked for general data, like their age and gender. No personally identifiable data will be collected.
Participants will see a list of tasks on their computer screen. They will be able to choose tasks they wish to do. They will get a description of the experiment, how long it takes, and how much compensation they will get.
Participants will complete on their screen a motor behavioral task, a cognitive task, and/or a questionnaire. For example, they may be asked to press sequences of numbers on the keyboard or move the mouse when a stimulus appears on the screen. Experiments may last up to 1 hour.
Participants can complete as many experiments as they wish. They can quit at any point.
详细描述
Objective:
Our overall goal in this protocol has been to gain insight into early motor skill learning (micro-learning) in large-scale healthy volunteer cohorts using online crowd-sourcing. We have used a simple keyboard typing task to study micro-offline performance improvements during early motor skill learning. This online approach limits the burden on participants (who perform tasks in the comfort of their homes instead of traveling to NIH) and substantially reduces burden on in-house human, financial and technical resources. Results from this protocol contribute to a better understanding of factors relevant to human motor skill learning, with important implications for the design of better motor learning and neurorehabilitative strategies after brain lesions. We had completed data collection for four aims under this protocol at the time we were informed by the NIH IRB that they determined this to be a thematic protocol (September 23, 2019).
The four specific aims addressed under this protocol are:
- Aim 1. To validate a motor skill learning task previously used by our group in lab-based studies {Bonstrup, 2019 #36} within an online, crowd-sourcing platform.
- Aim 2. To compare the influence of an interfering task applied during early ("early interference") vs late ("late interference") rest periods on motor learning, thus evaluating resistance to interference, a feature of consolidation.
- Aim 3. To evaluate the effects of a shorter practice period duration (i.e. - 5s vs. previously studied 10s duration) on micro-offline motor learning to gain insight into the impact of fatigue-related factors on learning.
- Aim 4. To evaluate the effects of randomly variable practice period durations between 5-10s in length on micro-offline gains
As instructed, the purpose of this amendment is to request authorization to proceed with data analysis and publication. No new experiments will be carried out under this protocol.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Case Only
- 时间视角
- Cross Sectional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 120 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
data analysis
时间窗: in data analysis
Aim 1. To validate a motor skill learning task previously used by our group in lab-based studies {Bonstrup, 2019 #36} within an online, crowd-sourcing platform. Aim 2. To compare the influence of an interfering task applied during early ( early interference group) vs late ( late interference ) rest periods on stabilization of motor learning. Aim 3. To evaluate the effects of shorter practice period durations (i.e. - 5s vs. previously studied 10s duration) on micro-offline motor learning to gain insight into the impact of fatigue-relatedfactors on learning. Aim 4. To evaluate the effects of randomly variable practice period durations between 5-10s in length on micro-offline gains
次要结局
未报告次要终点
