A Trial to Compare the Feasibility and Safety of Total Percutaneous Closure of Femoral Arterial Access Sites in the Veno-arterial ECMO Patients With Surgical Arterial Repair
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 40
- 主要终点
- Perclose technical success
研究概览
简要总结
The most frequent access site for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is the common femoral artery (CFA), using either an open or percutaneous technique. Currently, percutaneous closure devices for femoral arterial access sites are approved for use only when a 10-F or smaller sheath has been used. However, the availability of the Perclose ProGlide (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) device has now made it possible to perform percutaneous vessel closure after using larger sheaths.The preclose technique using Perclose ProGlide, has been widely used in endovascular procedures. In a prospective randomized study, complication rates at the access site were similar in patients who underwent total percutaneous access (including percutaneous arteriotomy closure) than in those who underwent surgical cutdown and subsequent surgical closure. Total percutaneous closure of femoral arterial access sites increases patient comfort and decreases the rate of wound infections and lymphatic fistulas.[6,7] Furthermore, patients are mobilized and discharged earlier following the use of closure devices than with compression alone. Despite the above observations, no data have been published regarding percutaneous closure of femoral artery access sites in patients who have undergone VA-ECMO. In this study, we evaluated the safety and feasibility of a percutaneous closure technique using Perclose ProGlide to close the CFA access site after VA-ECMO.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Retrospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •The study included all patients who underwent VA-ECMO and in whom Perclose ProGlide was deployed to achieve hemostasis during closure of the CFA site.
排除标准
- •Patients were excluded if 24 hour and 30-day follow-up data regarding the access sites and other clinical outcomes were not available.
结局指标
主要结局
Perclose technical success
时间窗: 1day
successful arterial closure of the CFA access site without the need for adjunctive successful arterial closure of the CFA access site without the need for adjunctive surgical or endovascular procedures.
Primary device failure
时间窗: 1day
obvious closure site bleeding after 2 Perclose ProGlides deployed, and complete device failure was defined as closure site bleeding which need surgical intervention
次要结局
- Access-related complications(up to 24 hours after closure and during 30 days of follow-up.)
