A Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Care, for Vascular, Plastic and General Surgery
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 撤回
- 发起方
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Surgical site infection
研究概览
简要总结
A comparison between the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy and the efficacy of standard care dressing
详细描述
The aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (Prevena) and standard clinical dressing in terms of prevention of postoperative surgical site infection, length of hospital stay, and total cost of hospitalization among vascular, plastic and general surgery patients.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
Out study is a single-blinded randomized clinical trial. The patient will be informed about the type of dressing used for their wound care, but the investigator and the outcome assessor will be blinded for which type of dressing used for each participant patient.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 90 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Consent for participation from the patient or his legal representative
排除标准
- •Currently infected wounds
- •Patients with history of immunosupression
- •Pregnancy
结局指标
主要结局
Surgical site infection
时间窗: 30-day postoperative period
The rate of occurrence of signs and symptoms of surgical site infection
次要结局
- cost of hospitalization(6 months)
- length of total hospital stay(6 months)
- Rate of reoperation(30-day postoperative period)
研究者
Munier Nazzal, M.S. M.D
Investigator
University of Toledo Health Science Campus