跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07247500
NCT07247500尚未招募不适用

Impact of Reventilation After One-Lung Ventilation in Thoracic Surgery (OLVREEXP)

University Hospital, Rouen5 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 350 人开始时间: 2026年7月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
350
试验地点
5
主要终点
Postoperative pulmonary complications

研究概览

简要总结

Lung cancer is a common disease, and more than 8,000 patients in France undergo lobectomy or pulmonary segmentectomy each year. This surgery remains associated with significant postoperative pulmonary complications, whose incidence ranges from 15% to 49% depending on the study (1). The main complication is pulmonary atelectasis, which provides a favorable setting for the development of postoperative pneumonia.

In thoracic surgery, the operated lung is excluded, and one-lung ventilation is performed on the contralateral lung. During surgery, several strategies exist to prevent atelectasis during one-lung ventilation, known as protective ventilation strategies (2). At the end of the procedure, reventilation allows re-expansion of the previously excluded lung.

However, pulmonary reventilation induces the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and causes endothelial dysfunction, which may lead to pulmonary edema, thereby negating the benefits of intraoperative protective ventilation. Conversely, insufficient re-expansion may result in persistent postoperative atelectasis, whereas excessive re-expansion can cause volutrauma, alveolar trauma, and/or barotrauma to the operated lung (3).

Several reventilation techniques are currently used, but to our knowledge, the impact of reventilation itself has never been specifically studied. The first, empirical technique, consists of reventilating both lungs using the accessory circuit and the adjustable pressure-limiting (APL) valve, manually bagging the patient over several respiratory cycles (4). The main drawback of this method is the lack of monitoring of insufflated volumes and pressures.

The second, more recent technique, consists of reventilating the patient using the anesthesia machine circuit in controlled ventilation mode, which allows for precise monitoring of pressures and insufflated volumes (5). This approach provides real-time monitoring of lung re-expansion and could therefore be less harmful than the empirical method.

Thus, the objective of this study is to compare postoperative pulmonary complications between patients who underwent lung re-expansion using the accessory circuit and those who underwent lung re-expansion using the anesthesia machine circuit in controlled ventilation mode.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •ASA score ≤
  • •Undergoing a scheduled video-assisted or robot-assisted lobectomy or segmentectomy.
  • •Patient has read and understood the information sheet and signed the informed consent form.
  • •For women of childbearing potential, effective contraception and confirmation of the absence of an ongoing pregnancy by a negative blood or urine pregnancy test are required.
  • •Postmenopausal women (spontaneous, non-medically induced amenorrhea for at least 12 months prior to the inclusion visit).
  • •Patient affiliated with a social security system.

排除标准

  • •Patients with a BMI > 40 kg/m².
  • •Patients with severe chronic respiratory failure (COPD grade 3, FEV₁/FVC < 0.7 and FEV₁ < 50% - according to the GOLD 2025 classification).
  • •Patients with severe chronic renal failure (GFR < 30 mL/min).
  • •Patients at high risk of conversion to thoracotomy.
  • •Patients with a history of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) within 3 months prior to surgery.
  • •Patients with a known history of severe hepatic failure (Child-Pugh class B or C).
  • •Patients with a history of heart failure (NYHA class ≥ II).
  • •Patients with a history of pulmonary resection.
  • •Patients with uncontrolled asthma.
  • •Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • •Patients deprived of liberty by administrative or judicial decision, as well as those under legal protection, guardianship, or curatorship.

研究组 & 干预措施

Bipulmonary reventilation arm using the accessory circuit

Other

As lobectomy and segmentectomy are procedures of differing complexity, stratification according to the type of surgery will ensure a balanced distribution between the study groups. However, despite their differences, both procedures have similar operative durations and require complete atelectasis of the operated lung. The main distinction lies in the amount of pulmonary parenchyma removed (approximately 10% for segmentectomy and 30% for lobectomy).

This approach helps minimize bias related to variability in surgical procedures, as lobectomy is generally more invasive than segmentectomy. Consequently, each type of surgery will be represented comparably in both study groups. This stratification ensures that any differences observed between the groups can be attributed to the studied variable rather than to the type of surgical procedure.

干预措施: Bipulmonary Reventilation using the accessory circuit (Procedure)

Bipulmonary reventilation arm under controlled ventilation

Experimental

As lobectomy and segmentectomy are procedures of differing complexity, stratification according to the type of surgery will ensure a balanced distribution between the study groups. However, despite their differences, both procedures have similar operative durations and require complete atelectasis of the operated lung. The main distinction lies in the amount of pulmonary parenchyma removed (approximately 10% for segmentectomy and 30% for lobectomy).

This approach helps minimize bias related to variability in surgical procedures, as lobectomy is generally more invasive than segmentectomy. Consequently, each type of surgery will be represented comparably in both study groups. This stratification ensures that any differences observed between the groups can be attributed to the studied variable rather than to the type of surgical procedure.

干预措施: Bipulmonary Reventilation under controlled ventilation (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Postoperative pulmonary complications

时间窗: 7 postoperative days

The evaluation of the primary endpoint will be performed by an anesthesiologist blinded to the lung re-expansion technique used. The composite endpoint will consist of the occurrence, within the first 7 postoperative days, of at least one pulmonary complications (postoperative pneumonia, pleural effusion, postoperative atelectasis, pneumothorax, bronchospasm, or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)).

Postoperative pulmonary complications

时间窗: 7 postoperative days

The evaluation of the primary endpoint will be performed by an anesthesiologist blinded to the lung re-expansion technique used. The composite endpoint will consist of the occurrence, within the first 7 postoperative days, of at least one pulmonary complications (postoperative pneumonia, pleural effusion, postoperative atelectasis, pneumothorax, bronchospasm, or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)).

次要结局

  • Number of postoperative pulmonary complications(7 postoperative days)
  • Number of Death(30 postopeatives days)
  • Number of postoperative pulmonary complications(7 postoperative days)
  • Number of Death(30 postopeatives days)

研究者

发起方
University Hospital, Rouen
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (5)

Loading locations...

相似试验