跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/02/080615
CTRI/2025/02/080615尚未招募不适用

EFFECT OF PROPRIOCEPTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR FACILITATION VERSUS SEMISPINALIS CERVICIS TRAINING ON PAIN AND FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY IN CHRONIC MECHANICAL NECK PAIN

School of Health Sciences1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2025年2月24日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
NPRS

研究概览

简要总结

Background

Neck Pain is the 4th highest Musculoskeletal Condition in the General Population. The Prevalence of neck pain is 352 per 100,000 population and the incidence rate is 806.6. It Is Generally Higher in Females and Middle Age Group people. About two-thirds of people experience neck pain in middle age because of prolonged use of mobile and computer devices, without any physical activity. It is primarily caused by postural or mechanical basis.

Need of study

Previous studies have shown significant effect of PNF and Semispinalis cervicis training on mechanical neck pain. However, to the best of my knowledge there is no study available which shows that among these intervention which one provides better outcome. Therefore our need of the study is to identify the effect of PNF and semispinalis cervicis training on pain tolerance and functional disability in mechanical neck pain.

Aim of study

The aim of the study is to Compare the effect of PNF versus semispinalis cervicis training on pain and function in mechanical neck pain.

METHODOLOGY

In this study, Mechanical Neck Pain patients will be screened first and those fulfilling the inclusion criteria of our study will be selected. The written consent will be signed from the patient to ensure that they are willingly participating in the study. The consent shall be taken before commencement of the study. The participants will be explained about the study procedures. The patients will be randomly divided into two groups (A and B) of equal participants i.e. 25 Patients in each group using block randomization method. Then, the baseline assessments of pain and functional disability will be done.

.

Protocol for Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation:

The patient was in sitting position and the therapist stands behind the patient. The movement is performed by the patient with the help of therapist on the neck pattern

(a) Cranio-cervical extension with left rotation, (b) Cranio-cervical flexion with right rotation, (c) Cranio-cervical flexion with left rotation, (d) Cranio-cervical extension with a right rotation, these movements are combination of isotonic, dynamic reversal, and contract relaxation. Each pattern is performed for 10 repetitions with 10 min. Hold each stretch for 30 seconds, a 10-second push phase followed by 10-second relaxation phases. The treatment was given thrice a week for four weeks.

Protocol for Semispinalis Cervicis training:

The patients sitting on a stool without a backrest with a hip knee flexed 90 degrees and feet placed on the floor and the therapist stands on the side of the patient. The therapist placed the thumb and index finger on the posterior vertebral arch of C2.and pushed gently into flexion while the opposite hand stabilized the patient shoulder. Patient was asked to resist maximum voluntary contraction in the direction of extension without provocation of neck pain. The exercise was performed 10 minutes per set with 3 sets per day, hold resistance 10 sec, and 30 sec rest was allowed. Treatment to be performed for 10 min. The treatment was given thrice a week for four weeks.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 45.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Neck pain with a duration of at least 3 months or more.
  • NDI Scoring greater and equal to 5% NPRS scoring of greater and equal to 3.

排除标准

  • Cervical Radiculopathy or Myelopathy Spinal infection Cervical or Thoracic spine Fracture / Dislocation Surgery of the cervical or thoracic spine Psychic illness.

结局指标

主要结局

NPRS

时间窗: At baseline,4 Week

NDI

时间窗: At baseline,4 Week

Both Outcomes are used to Determine the effect of intervention.

时间窗: At baseline,4 Week

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
School of Health Sciences
申办方类型
Research institution
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Jyoti Ojha

School of Health Sciences

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验