跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07804238
NCT07804238已完成不适用

Comparative Study on the Diagnostic Validity of the Alvarado Score, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR), and Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS) in Acute Appendicitis at East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust (ELHT)

East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 300 人开始时间: 2026年4月13日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
300
试验地点
1
主要终点
Diagnostic Accuracy

研究概览

简要总结

This retrospective observational study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado Score, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) Score, and Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS) in predicting histologically confirmed acute appendicitis in adult patients presenting to East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust (ELHT). The study will include all emergency patients aged 16 years and above, of any gender, admitted between June 2023 and June 2024 with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis who subsequently underwent appendicectomy via laparoscopic or open approaches. For each patient, the Alvarado, AIR, and AAS scores will be calculated retrospectively using information from presenting symptoms, physical examination findings, and laboratory investigations recorded at the time of admission. These calculated scores will be compared against the final histopathology results, which serve as the gold standard for diagnosis. Diagnostic performance will be assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Sensitivity reflects the proportion of patients with appendicitis correctly identified by the score, while specificity measures the ability to correctly exclude those without the condition. PPV indicates the likelihood that a positive score truly represents acute appendicitis, whereas NPV represents the likelihood that a negative score accurately rules it out. Accurate and timely pre-operative diagnosis of acute appendicitis is essential to minimise the incidence of negative appendicectomies while avoiding unnecessary diagnostic investigations. This study also aims to determine the most effective scoring system for risk stratification in the local adult population, considering the demographic diversity, and to provide recommendations for the standardisation of appendicitis risk assessment tools in emergency surgical practice within the trust.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
16 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients of any gender
  • Patients aged 16 and above
  • Admitted as an emergency with suspected appendicitis
  • Must have undergone appendicectomy (laparoscopic, open, or laparotomy) from June 2023 to June 2024 at East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust

排除标准

  • Patients who have undergone elective, interval, or incidental appendicectomies.
  • Patients younger than 16

研究组 & 干预措施

ELHT Patient Population

All emergency patients of any gender and aged 16 and above who were admitted between June 2023 and June 2024 with a clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis and who subsequently underwent an appendicectomy (via laparoscopy, open surgery, or laparotomy).

结局指标

主要结局

Diagnostic Accuracy

时间窗: From initial clinical assessment at presentation to histological diagnosis following appendicectomy, is up to 6 months

Which scoring system - Alvarado Score, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) Score or Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS) has the highest diagnostic accuracy for predicting histologically confirmed appendicitis among patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy? \[Diagnostic accuracy will be assessed by comparing their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis and Area Under the Curve (AUC) will be presented to assess the overall discriminative performance.\]

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验