跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03758313
NCT03758313已完成不适用

Non-Invasive Monitoring of Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide in Mechanically Ventilated Preterm Infants

Tobias Werther1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 27 人开始时间: 2018年11月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
27
试验地点
1
主要终点
Carbon Dioxide in Mechanically Ventilated Preterm Infants

研究概览

简要总结

In mechanically ventilated preterm infants, the ability to monitor carbon dioxide partial pressure (pCO2) values is indispensable. The gold standard for pCO2 measurement is from an arterial blood sample (paCO2). This has two drawbacks: firstly, it requires an arterial line and, secondly, it does not provide the clinicians with a continuous measurement. At present, two alternative pCO2 monitoring systems are available in the field of neonatal intensive care medicine: end-tidal CO2 (etCO2) capnography and transcutaneous CO2 (tcCO2) measurements. Both methods have disadvantages including potential technical errors as well as pathologies that may reduce reliability as a surrogate for blood gas analysis (BGA). In particular, conventional side-stream etCO2 capnography underestimates pCO2 in presence of a tube leakage, which is a common occurrence in ventilated preterm infants where only tubes without cuff are used. Distal etCO2 (detCO2) by means of a double lumen endo-tracheal tube may solve the problem of unreliable etCO2 values in the presence of tube leakage.

The aim of this study is to compare the agreement, precision and repeatability of the distal etCO2-measurement technique described by Kugelman et al. with respect to paCO2 and tcCO2 in mechanically ventilated preterm infants. Since ventilation strategies and pCO2 limits may vary among different centers, this study helps to determine which non-invasive CO2 monitoring system (detCO2 or tcO2) is more suitable in terms of applicability and reliability in preterm infants at our neonatal intensive care units.

详细描述

Background: In mechanically ventilated preterm infants, the ability to monitor carbon dioxide partial pressure (pCO2) values is indispensable. The gold standard for pCO2 measurement is from an arterial blood sample (paCO2). This has two drawbacks: firstly, it requires an arterial line and, secondly, it does not provide the clinicians with a continuous measurement. At present, two alternative pCO2 monitoring systems are available in the field of neonatal intensive care medicine: end-tidal CO2 (etCO2) capnography and transcutaneous CO2 (tcCO2) measurements. Both methods have disadvantages including potential technical errors as well as pathologies that may reduce reliability as a surrogate for blood gas analysis (BGA). In particular, conventional side-stream etCO2 capnography underestimates pCO2 in presence of a tube leakage, which is a common occurrence in ventilated preterm infants where only tubes without cuff are used. Distal etCO2 (detCO2) by means of a double lumen endo-tracheal tube may solve the problem of unreliable etCO2 values in the presence of tube leakage.

Several studies compared etCO2 and tcCO2 to paCO2, simultaneously. A comparison study of etCO2 and tcCO2 in a cohort of critically ill children did not reveal significant differences in the absence of severe pulmonary parenchymal disease. Tobias et al compared etCO2 and tcCO2 in a cohort of pediatric intensive care patients with respiratory failure and found tcCO2 measurements to be more accurate. In a cohort of ventilated newborns, tcCO2 monitoring was generally more precise than etCO2 during neonatal transport to monitor ventilation. In a more recent study restricted to a cohort of postsurgical neonates without lung disease, etCO2 underestimated paCO2 more than tcCO2 but provided greater precision over paCO2, however it was less accurate at smaller tidal volumes. These studies have in common that the adapter of the pCO2 analyzer was attached in-line and proximal to the endotracheal tube.

Aim of the study: The aim of this study is to compare the agreement, precision and repeatability of the distal etCO2-measurement technique described by Kugelman et al. with respect to paCO2 and tcCO2 in mechanically ventilated preterm infants. Since ventilation strategies and pCO2 limits may vary among different centers, this study helps to determine which non-invasive CO2 monitoring system (detCO2 or tcO2) is more suitable in terms of applicability and reliability in preterm infants at our neonatal intensive care units.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Preterm infants with a current body weight between 1000 g and 3000 g who require intubation.
  • Signed informed consent from parents or legal guardians.
  • Expected to provide at least three measurements of paCO2 and detCO2.

排除标准

  • Infants with known congenital anomalies of the heart and/or lung.
  • Need for high frequency oscillation.
  • Parents or legal guardians deny informed consent.

结局指标

主要结局

Carbon Dioxide in Mechanically Ventilated Preterm Infants

时间窗: 48 hours

partial pressure of carbon dioxide

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Tobias Werther

Dr.

Medical University of Vienna

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验