Macintosh Versus Macgrath for Laryngoscopy in COVID 19 Hypoxemic ICU Patients
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 80
- 主要终点
- Time for tracheal intubation
研究概览
简要总结
In this comparative prospective study, we aim to compare the classic Macintosh laryngoscope and the Mac Grath videolaryncoscope in ICU covid 19 patients recruiting intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation.
patients meeting inclusion criteria were randomized in 2 groups: MacGrath and Macintosh.
we collected anthropometric and intubation data among all patients, and the 2 groups were compared regarding the time for intubation, the need of alternative techniques to intubate and the impact on the oxygenation by recording the lowest SPO2.
详细描述
In this comparative prospective study, we aim to compare the classic Macintosh laryngoscope and the Mac Grath videolaryncoscope in ICU covid 19 patients recruiting intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation.
All hypoxemic COVID19 patients requiring intubation were enrolled in this trial.
all patients had a preoxygenation with non invasive ventilation with 100% oxygen.
patients meeting inclusion criteria were randomized in 2 groups: MacGrath and Macintosh.
we collected anthropometric and intubation data among all patients, and the 2 groups were compared regarding the time for intubation, the need of alternative techniques to intubate and the impact on the oxygenation by recording the lowest SPO2.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Case Control
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •All COVID 19 hypoxemic patients requiring tracheal intubation
排除标准
- •hypoxemic cardiac arrest before intubation
结局指标
主要结局
Time for tracheal intubation
时间窗: 10 minutes
Time from the blade pass the lips until the first breath was administred
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Mhamed Sami Mebazaa
Professor head of anesthesia and intensive care department
Mongi Slim Hospital