跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04418310
NCT04418310Unknown不适用

Lay Open and Curettage Versus Endoscopic (E.P.Si.T) Method in the Treatment of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease

Mansoura University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2020年6月12日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
30
试验地点
1
主要终点
recurrence rate

研究概览

简要总结

Aim of the work To compare lay open technique versus Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment as regards recurrence rate, operative data, postoperative pain, intra and postoperative complications, healing time and return to daily activity

详细描述

Introduction Pilonidal sinus is a very common inflammatory disease of gluteal region (McCallum et al., 2008). Its incidence is 26/100,000 and it usually occurs in working males of age 15 to 30.

The disease itself dates back to 1833 when Herbert Mayo, British Physiologist, Anatomist and Surgeon described it as a sinus containing hair follicles located in the sacrococcygeal region in a woman.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adult patients of both genders with symptoms from sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus were included in our study.

排除标准

  • Abscess formation
  • Immunodeficiency.
  • Patients with congenital asymptomatic pits.
  • Patient with psychiatric disease disabling surgical intervention.
  • Pregnant females

结局指标

主要结局

recurrence rate

时间窗: one year

recurrence rate of pilonidal sinus symptoms after healing

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验