跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01445249
NCT01445249已完成不适用

A Randomised, Blinded Comparison of a Nerve Stimulator Guided Ankle Block Compared to a Landmark Guided Ankle Block for Pain Relief After Forefoot Surgery.

Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 72 人开始时间: 2007年3月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
72
试验地点
2
主要终点
Efficacy of local anaesthetic block.

研究概览

简要总结

Forefoot surgery includes bunion surgery and similar reconstructive bone cutting surgery and is very painful. Local anaesthetic nerve blocks are used to provide pain relief after this work. The purpose of this study is to compare two techniques: one using anatomical landmarks alone to guide local anaesthetic infiltration, the other using peripheral nerve stimulation to guide local anaesthetic infiltration (termed medial forefoot block). The two techniques will be compared for reliability of postoperative analgesia.

详细描述

More extensive description not desired.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 85 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Fit adults requiring forefoot surgery with bone cutting

排除标准

  • Morbid obesity (BMI > 40)
  • Known contraindications to regional anaesthesia

结局指标

主要结局

Efficacy of local anaesthetic block.

时间窗: Over ninety minutes from the start of the study.

The number of patients in each study arm with altered sensation to cold and pin prick, together with no requirement for opiate analgesia, following surgery was recorded.

次要结局

  • Intravenous opiate usage following surgery(24 hours following surgery)

研究者

申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验