跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05545163
NCT05545163已完成不适用

Comparison of Simulated Standard Versus Modified Jaw Thrust I-gel Insertion Technique in Novice Anesthesiologists: A Randomised Control Crossover Trial

Aga Khan University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 14 人开始时间: 2021年10月2日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
14
试验地点
2
主要终点
The ease of I-gel insertion was measured on the basis of number of I-gel insertion attempts.

研究概览

简要总结

The primary objective of study was to compare insertion ease by modified I-gel jaw thrust insertion technique and standard I-gel insertion technique on the basis of I-gel insertion attempts and I-gel insertion time duration. The secondary objective of study was to analyse the impact of prior information for airway device, insertion techniques, general or specific work experience in airway management with the ease of both study's insertion techniques. And, tertiary objective of study was to analyse the trainee's preference insertion technique at the basis of learning method and practical adaptability.

Hypothesis:

The modified I-gel jaw thrust insertion technique is easy to understand and practice than the standard I-gel insertion technique at the beginning of airway management training among the novice anesthesiologists.

详细描述

  • I-gel insertion attempts are the number of I-gel insertion attempts with each study's insertion technique. The 10 insertion attempts allowed to performed with each insertion technique by trainees.
  • I-gel insertion time duration was the time taken to complete I-gel insertion; from the holding of device till the confirmation of chest movement (artificial lung inflation in manikin).
  • The correlation of previous information for airway device, insertion techniques, general or specific work experience in airway management with the ease of both study's insertion techniques were assessed by asking from participant's questionnaire based at the start of study.
  • The trainees were asked at the end of study for preferred insertion method at novice level on the basis of learning method and practical conduct (user friendly).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • First year anaesthesia residents
  • Using adult mannequin

排除标准

  • Pediatric mannequin
  • Participant's refusal

结局指标

主要结局

The ease of I-gel insertion was measured on the basis of number of I-gel insertion attempts.

时间窗: 5 minutes

Ease of I-gel insertion in mannequin mouth was measured by performing the 10 times insertion of I-gel with both study techniques in mannequin mouth by trainees.

The ease of I-gel insertion was measured on the basis of final I-gel insertion time taken duration.

时间窗: 5 minutes

The total time duration of final I-gel insertion confirmation in mannequin mouth was recorded. The time duration counting was started from I-gel holding in operator's hand to the confirmed successful insertion in mannequin mouth.

次要结局

  • The trainee's baseline knowledge was assessed for the studied modified jaw thrust I-gel insertion technique.(2 minutes)
  • The trainee's baseline knowledge was assessed for the general or specific work experience in airway management using the I-gel.(1 minute)
  • The trainee's baseline knowledge was assessed for the type I-gel insertion techniques.(1 minute)
  • The trainee's baseline knowledge was assessed for the type of supraglottic airway devices and I-gel insertion techniques.(1 minute)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dileep Kumar

Assistant Professor

Aga Khan University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验