跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06713213
NCT06713213已完成不适用

Clinical Comparison of FRNDS Cannula and Plethysmography Belts

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University4 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 57 人开始时间: 2025年4月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
57
试验地点
4
主要终点
Measurement of Tidal volumes ( Minute Ventilation) and comparison of novel device with standard technology

研究概览

简要总结

SUMMARY:

This is a quantitative, non-inferiority study using healthy participants to compare tidal volumes at rest measured by both a standard RIP belt and a flow-regulated nasal oxygen delivery system FRNDS cannula.

Recording of tidal breathing is essential for patients undergoing evaluation for respiratory disease and reduced exercise capacity. Conventional spirometry techniques involving pneumotachometers are currently employed worldwide in pulmonary testing laboratories to record pulmonary flow and calculate tidal volumes by allowing subjects to breath out of mouth into these devices. However, concurrent use of pneumotachometers while testing a novel nasal device is not feasible. Respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP) has been developed and validated to evaluate tidal ventilation during quiet breathing using a band around the chest. RIP signals may be contaminated by body movements resulting in artifacts which may be a limitation. However, although a crude method when compared to spirometry, RIP remains a viable method for comparison.

FRNDS is a novel cannula device that can both measure tidal volume (VT) in real time while simultaneously delivering air to the patient. The gold-standard of measuring VT clinically is spirometry; however, this test cannot be completed when patients are receiving supplemental oxygen or air.

Thus far, the FRNDS cannula has been tested in vitro with a cylindrical flow model and has accurately measured simulated VTs with 80% accuracy, but has not yet been validated in Human subjects. To assess the devices robustness in a clinical scenario is essential to the development and eventually adaptation of FRNDS in clinical care.

OBJECTIVES:-

In this study the investigators aim to describe and validate flow-regulated nasal oxygen delivery system (FRNDS) instrumented nasal cannula as a non-inferior methodology of measuring flows at the nasal interface compared to conventional methods (e.g., RIP belts) with the added benefit of administering a dose of air to the subjects.

While the FRNDS device was validated in vitro in a cylindrical model, the investigators aim to show equivalence to standard respiratory measurement methods in healthy subjects. This milestone will be essential towards the eventual translation of an adaptive cannula system that measures and adjusts air flow according to patient needs in real time.

ENDPOINTS:

The primary endpoint of this study is the continuous measurement of a test subjects Vt and Minute ventilation ( VE) while simultaneously delivering variable volumes of air to the patient and comparing these results with Vts and VE captured with conventional technology (RIP belts). The investigators will also be collecting inspiratory time (Ti) expiratory time (Te) continuously and a single measurement of nasal cavity openings (e.g., internal vertical and horizontal dimensions 1 cm inside the nares using calipers)

详细描述

STUDY DESIGN:

For each subject, over the 10-minute period the investigators will be collecting time-series data consisting of tidal volume (VT, VE derived from a fluid dynamics modeling equation based on pressure sensors and the measured diameter of the patient & nasal cavity), inspiratory time (Ti), and expiratory time (Te). Accordingly, minute ventilation will be calculated throughout the trial. Mean, standard deviation, and quartile (e.g., 25th, 50th, and 75th) measurements will be calculated after the trial is complete.

In addition, using the aforementioned measurements and the nasal cavity diameter measurements taken at the beginning of the trial, the investigators will be comparing the accuracy of the VT derived from our measure nasal cavity diameters and compare them to statistical nasal cavity sizes based on participant demographics (Corey et al. Otolayngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 119:389-93). Means, standard deviations, and quartile measurements will be compared between the measured and statistical nasal cavity diameter groups.

The data collected from RIP belts and the FRNDS cannula will be measured via descriptive statistics (e.g., mean, variance, standard deviation), a paired t-Test, Cross-Correlation Function, mean squared error (to determine absolute differences between measurements), and potentially dynamic time warping (DTW) to account for shifts and distortions in time.

METHODOLOGY:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Participants must be healthy adults over the age of 18.

排除标准

  • Adults with preexisting comorbidities including:
  • Chronic lung disease
  • Chronic heart disease
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • History of nasal surgery
  • History of upper airway reconstructive surgery
  • History of deviated nasal septum
  • Preferential mouth breathers
  • Minors, as defined by state law where the study is performed (infants, children, teenagers)
  • Pregnant women will be excluded, as they have physiologically altered respiratory parameters and to minimize potential mechanical discomfort due to the RIP belts.
  • Prisoners (including all incarcerated individuals)
  • Adults not capable to consent on their own behalf

结局指标

主要结局

Measurement of Tidal volumes ( Minute Ventilation) and comparison of novel device with standard technology

时间窗: Through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Continuous measurement of a patients VT and Minute Ventilation while simultaneously delivering variable volumes of air to the subjects and comparing these results with VTs and Minute ventilation captured with conventional technology (RIP belts)

次要结局

  • Continuous measurement of Inspiratory time (Ti), and expiratory time (Te) and minute ventilation and comparison with standard technology(Through study completion, an average of 1 year.)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验