What Technique for Caudal Block in Children: Conventional or Ultrasound-guided
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 94
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Success rate of block
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of our study is to compare ultrasound-guided caudal block to the conventional technique based on anatomical landmarks.
详细描述
The primary endpoint was the success rate of each technique. We also collected the time taken for each technique, the number of punctures, and the incidence of complications (subcutaneous infiltration, intravascular injection).
Children were randomized to receive a caudal block based on anatomical landmarks (group C) or ultrasound-guided (group E) at a dose of 1 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine, not exceeding 20 ml.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 6 Months 至 6 Years（Child）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •children aged between 6 months and 6 years, ASA 1 , underwent elective surgery
排除标准
- •severe systemic diseases, previous neurological or spinal disorders, coagulation abnormalities, allergies toward LAs, local infection at the block site
结局指标
主要结局
Success rate of block
时间窗: during surgery
A successful block was defined as an absence of significant motor movements following surgical induction or aberrations in the heart or respiratory rates
次要结局
- block performing time(perioperative)
- number of needle puncture(during procedure)
- complication rates(during procedure)
研究者
Mehdi Trifa
Head of the anesthesia and intensive care department
Tunis University