Types of Fixation in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
- Conditions
- Rotator Cuff Tear
- Interventions
- Procedure: single rowProcedure: double row fixation
- Registration Number
- NCT00508183
- Lead Sponsor
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
- Brief Summary
The study will identify if there is a difference of quality of life after surgery between two techniques used in surgery. The two different techniques are either the Single Row Fixation or the Double Row Fixation.
- Detailed Description
Primary Research Question; What is the difference in disease specific quality of life between patients who undergo a repair of the rotator cuff with arthroscopic technique using single-row fixation, versus double-row fixation, as measured by the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC)at one year post op?
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 90
- Patients who have failed standard non-surgical management of their rotator cuff tear, and who would benefit from a surgical repair of the cuff.
- Imaging and intra-operative findings confirming a full thickness tear of the rotator cuff.
- Characteristics of the cuff tear that render the cuff irrepairable.
- Significant shoulder comorbidities
- Previous surgery on affected shoulder
- Patients with active workers compensation claims
- Active joint or systemic infection
- Significant muscle paralysis
- Rotatorcuff tear arthropathy
- Charcots arthropathy
- Major medical illness
- Unable to speak or read English
- Psychiatric illness that precludes informed consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description single row fixation single row - double row fixation double row fixation -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) 2 years Do patients who undergo a repair of the rotator cuff with arthroscopic technique using double row fixation have increased disease specific quality of life (measured by WORC) then patients who undergo a repair with arthroscopic technique using single-row fixation? The WORC scale is from 0% to 100%, with a higher value being indicative of better disease specific quality of life.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Constant Score 2 Year Differences in outcome between the two groups as measured by the Constant score. The constant score ranges from 1 to 100 with a higher value indicative of better shoulder function.
ASES Score 2 Year Determination of differences in outcome between the two groups as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. The ASES score ranges from 0 to 100 with a higher number indicative of better function.
Strength Test 2 Years Shoulder strength in forward elevation was measured in kg using a portable scale.
Healing Rate 1 Year Percentage of Participants who had healed by 1 year post-surgery as measured using magnetic resonance imaging. If the tendons were in continuity with no evidence of full-thickness tearing, the repair was considered healed (intact).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
The Ottawa Hospital
🇨🇦Ottawa, Ontario, Canada