Comparison of the Pentax AWS s-100 and the new Pentax AWS s-200 in the success rate of tracheal intubatio
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- The Pentax AWS s-100 The Pentax AWS s-200
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000018922
- Lead Sponsor
- Dokkyo Medical University Koshigaya Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 70
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with any pathology of the neck or upper respiratory tract or at risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents were excluded. Patients in whom ventilation through a facemask and tracheal intubation were predicted to be difficult were also not taken into the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The primary outcome is the success rate of intubation using AWS s-100 or AWS s-200, and we compare the success rate. We measure the time for traceal intubation(start laryngoscope(by AWS) to the tracheal tube through the glottis). In many reports, the success rate was higher than 95% in first attempt, and average time for traceal intubation was 30 sec by AWS s-100. In our study, we define the intubation is successful within 60 sec by AWS(s-100 or s-200), and failure over 60 sec. If the intubation was failure, we record the reason (tracheal tube hit artenoids et, al). We could not intubate within 60 sec, we can adjusted tube position by pressing the patient's neck, and try the tracheal intubation. Fisher's test is used to compare the success rate of the intubation by AWS s-100 or AWS s-200, and 95% CI for differences in the success rates between the two occasions.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of the time for tracheal intubation by s-100, or s-200. Comparison of the view of the glottis by s-100, or s-200.