The difference between continuous and intermittent enteral feeding with naso gastric tube in paediatric critically ill children.
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: J80- Acute respiratory distress syndromeHealth Condition 2: I959- Hypotension, unspecifiedHealth Condition 3: R098- Other specified symptoms and signsinvolving the circulatory and respiratory systems
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/06/068348
- Lead Sponsor
- AIIMS Raipur
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
All children between the age of 1 month to less than 15 years, who are likely to stay in PICU for more than 48 hours, not being able to take food orally, enteral nutrition through naso gastric or oro gastric tube for mor than 4 days using standard food formula.
1.Children with altered Nasogastric tube aspirate
2.Children with enterocolitis
3.Children with surgical abdomen
4.Children with skull base injury.
5.Children with short bowel syndrome
6.Expected death within 24 hours
7. Readmission to PICU more than 48 hours after already having been included in the CONVINCE trial.
8) Transfer from another PICU after stay of more than or equal to 3 days or having received enteral nutrition
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method