Lidocaine Injection Versus Sham Needling in Treating Whiplash Associated Disorder
- Conditions
- Whiplash InjuriesNeck Pain
- Interventions
- Other: SalineProcedure: Lidocaine
- Registration Number
- NCT02060734
- Lead Sponsor
- Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
- Brief Summary
To determine the efficacy of lidocaine injection of trigger points versus subcutaneous injection in patients with subacute whiplash associated disorder following injury.
- Detailed Description
This is a double-blind, randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy of lidocaine injection of trigger points versus subcutaneous injection in patients with subacute whiplash associated disorder following injury. Outcomes include pain, objective assessment, self-report function recovery, impact on work performance and globe perceived effects which will be assessed 5 minutes, 2 and 6 weeks following injection.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
- fulfill the Grade II Quebec Task Force classification of WAD,
- with identifiable myofascial trigger points ( which occur with or without a taut band),
- reproduction of recognizable pain with sustained pressure ( up to 10 seconds) on trigger points
- aged 18 to 70
- a good understanding of informed consent and willing to attend this trial.
- have serious injury such as fracture and internal bleeding
- suspicion of upper cervical instability or neurological deficits
- clinical evidence of radiculopathy
- a history of active cancer, central nerve disorder, blood clotting disorders, needle phobia
- anticoagulant medication user
- previous experience with any type of needling for myofascial pain
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Saline Saline The control group will receive a 25 gauge, 40mm long needle, pre-filled with saline inserting to subcutis. lidocaine Lidocaine The treatment group will receive a 25 gauge, 40mm long needle, pre-filled with 1% lidocaine inserting into the site of the trigger point. Three to five points injection.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method pain 2 weeks following injection 10 cm Visual Analog Scale
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method work performance Immediately, 2 and 6 weeks after injection questionnaire
pain 6 weeks following injection 10 cm Visual Analog Scale
globe perceived effects Immediately, 2 and 6 weeks after injection The Short Form-12
cervical range of motion Immediately, 2 and 6 weeks after injection self-report neck disability Immediately, 2 and 6 weeks after injection
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Department of physical medicine and rehabilitation, McMaster University
🇨🇦Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
HHS (Juravinski Hospital Site)
🇨🇦Hamilton, Ontario, Canada