CTRI/2015/02/005548Recruiting未知
Comparison of Adapted Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway versus Standard Care following Simple Closure of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer-A Randomised Controlled Trial
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- 未知
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sponsor
- JIPMER
- Enrollment
- 70
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •all consecutive patients more than 18 years undergoing simple closure of perforated peptic ulcer less than 10mm in size
Exclusion Criteria
- •Age less than 18 years
- •presence of any psychiatric or neurological illness
- •ASA class 3 or 4
- •irreversible septic shock
- •Spontaneously sealed off perforations that did not require surgical repair
- •multiple perforated peptic ulcers
- •Patients having concomitant definitive surgery or additional procedures done eg TV with GJ
Investigators
Similar Trials
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of routine care Vs assisted recovery based care in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery.CTRI/2021/05/033558Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education And Research JIPMER
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
adapted enhanced recovery after surgery pathway vs. standard care in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for perforation peritonitis- Which is better?CTRI/2019/02/017537Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education Research Government of India
Completed
Phase 2
Comparison of adapted enhanced recovery after surgery pathway vs. standard care in patients undergoing emergency small bowel surgeryCTRI/2017/04/008294JIPMER70
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparing the outcome of surgery in total robotic hysterectomy: traditional vs ERAS pathwayCTRI/2022/04/041913ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES RISHIKESH
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A study between enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols and routine protocols in elective caesarean deliveriesCTRI/2022/03/041294ShriBMPatil Medical College