CASI-Plus: A Mobile Health (mHealth) Tool for Client Engagement to Improve Ukraine's Assisted Partner Services (APS) Program Workflow and HIV Testing Outcomes (Aim 2)

In December 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended scale-up of assisted partner notification services (APS) as a strategy to increase HIV testing among persons living with HIV (PLWH). APS offers PLWH assistance to confidentially notify their sex and needle-sharing partners of their exposure and link them to testing and treatment. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that APS increases HIV testing and case-finding, and is cost-effective. APS is scalable in routine practice, but typically with lower HIV case-finding than was observed in RCTs. APS outcomes are sub-optimal when recipients only name their current sex partner, or when partner notification and testing does not occur. There are an estimated 240,000 PLWH in Ukraine, of whom roughly three in four know their HIV status. While population-level HIV prevalence is 1.0%, prevalence among persons who inject drugs (PWID) and men who have sex with men (MSM) is 23% and 8%, respectively.

In 2019, the Ukraine Ministry of Health began scaling APS services. Despite trainings that emphasized the need to elicit >1 partner for each index client, health workers (HW) elicited only 1.14 for sexual and needle-sharing partners per index client, on average.16 Only 5.6% of APS clients identified as MSM or PWID and 45.9% of partners with unknown status had not yet completed HIV testing after 30 days.

The CASI-Plus mHealth intervention seeks to improve partner elicitation and testing, through a mHealth client engagement tool using computer-assisted self-interview (CASI). The CASI-Plus tool supports the initial APS encounter (providing information on how APS works, eliciting names of all sexual or injection partners, screening for risk of intimate partner violence [IPV], and planning for partner notification), and facilitates case management through partner testing (via repeat follow-up surveys to assess for barriers to notification, interest in provider assistance, IPV, and completion of notification). While CASI has reduced social desirability bias in surveys of sexual behavior across diverse settings, it has not yet been used in APS programs in low- or middle-income countries (LMICs). This implementation science research will provide useful evidence on whether CASI-Plus can improve partner elicitation and HIV testing in a routine APS program operating at scale, toward the ultimate goal of linkage to HIV prevention and treatment services among those at highest risk of HIV.

Aim 1 (R21): Conduct formative research from health worker and client perspectives to design the CASI-Plus mHealth intervention. Approach: The investigators will complete in-depth interviews with APS clients (N=10) and focus group discussions with HWs (N=2 groups of 8 HWs) to elicit barriers to partner elicitation and testing, use this information to design the CASI-Plus tool and its integration within the APS workflow, and test the tool for technical performance, usability, and acceptability. Hypothesis: CASI-Plus will be perceived by both clients and HWs as easy to navigate, acceptable, and technically sound. [NOTE: Aim 1 is covered under a separate submission to ClinicalTrials.gov]

Aim 2 (R21): In a RCT, assess adoption of CASI-Plus and its impact on contact elicitation. Approach: In one high-volume health facility, the investigators will randomize PLWH (N=154) to either the CASI-Plus or standard care (SC) APS workflow, and measure the use of the tool and contact index using routinely-collected data. Hypothesis: Clients will complete initial and follow-up surveys, and will report more partners when using the tool.