Comparison of three different restorative material in carious teeth in vivo study
Not Applicable
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/10/028546
- Lead Sponsor
- Tejasvini Bhagwandas Prajapati
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Closed to Recruitment of Participants
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Healthy individuals with carious tooth requiring class-I restoration
Both male and female will be included
Patients aged 18-45 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
Healthy individuals with Pathologic pulpal diagnosis with pain(non-vital)
Healthy individuals with Defective restoration adjacent to or opposing the tooth
Healthy individuals with Rampant caries
Healthy individuals with Poor oral hygiene
Healthy individuals with Severe or chronic periodontitis
Healthy individuals with Heavy bruxism
Healthy individuals with Allergy to materials used in this trial
Healthy individuals with previous restorations, tooth surface loss (attrition, erosion, abrasion or abfraction)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method comparative clinical evaluation of new improved bioactive resin modified glass ionomer cement with and without bonding and zirconia infused glass ionomer cementTimepoint: 1 month,3 month,6 month
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method clinical evaluation of new improved bioactive resin modified glass ionomer cement with bonding. <br/ ><br>clinical evaluation of new improved bioactive resin modified glass ionomer cement without bonding. <br/ ><br>clinical evaluation of zirconia infused glass ionomer cement. <br/ ><br>clinical evalution of resin modified glass ionomer cement. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 1 month,3 month,6 month