Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05905640
NCT05905640
Recruiting
N/A

One-stop PrEP Care Pathway to Simplify PrEP Delivery in Kenya: The One-Stop PrEP Care Project

University of Washington1 site in 1 country2,400 target enrollmentJanuary 1, 2024
ConditionsHIV Infections

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
HIV Infections
Sponsor
University of Washington
Enrollment
2400
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
PrEP initiation
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this cluster randomized study is to understand if using a One stop PrEP delivery model can improve the efficiency of PrEP service delivery, reduce the cost of providing PrEP and allow continuation on PrEP. The investigators will evaluate data from men and women ≥15 years of age unknown to be living with HIV seeking PrEP services at public health facilities in western Kenya.

Detailed Description

This study will evaluate the effectiveness of one-stop PrEP services in 12 public health facilities in Kenya. The core implementation strategies to optimize one-stop PrEP care will include training of healthcare providers, technical assistance, joint clinic supervision with the county health officials, and abstraction of program data regarding PrEP initiations and continuations including characteristics of PrEP users for quality improvement. Within this large program, the study team will recruit a nested observational cohort to obtain detailed complementary individual clinical, behavioral, and mental health outcomes (including for clients who discontinue PrEP).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 1, 2024
End Date
July 31, 2027
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Kenneth K Mugwanya

Assistant Professor: Global Health

University of Washington

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • ≥15 years of age
  • Accessing PrEP services at implementing clinics.
  • Eligible for PrEP per Kenya national guidelines
  • For in-depth and key delivery informant interviews
  • Able and willing to provide consent
  • Provides services at participating clinics (healthcare providers)
  • Key policy maker

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

PrEP initiation

Time Frame: Years 2-4 of the study, up to 36 months.

PrEP initiation will be measured by client start of PrEP use documented on the ministry of health (MOH) tools. Data will be abstracted from MOH tools by project dedicated staff from up to 2400 persons newly initiating PrEP at the participating clinics.

Total client wait time and staff time spent on PrEP services

Time Frame: Throughout the study period, up to 36 months

Efficiency will be defined as client wait time and staff time spent on PrEP services. Time will be done by observing at least 50 clinical visits per arm to assess wait time and staff time spent on counseling, HIV testing, clinical review, and PrEP provision

Acceptability

Time Frame: Throughout the study period, up to 36 months

Acceptability will be determined as the perception among clients, providers, and stakeholder that one-stop PrEP services is agreeable to them. Mixed methods assessments, including user and provider surveys and qualitative interviews with users and providers will be utilized to measure acceptability. The Proctors implementation framework will be utilized to organize outcomes and to understand acceptability of one-stop and quality improvement measures at the user, clinic, and provider level. Investigators will comprehensively triangulate all data sources to understand how system, provider, and client factors interact to influence adoption.

Adoption

Time Frame: Throughout the study period, up to 36 months

Adoption will be determined as the proportion and characteristics of facilities adopting one-stop services. Mixed methods assessments, including provider surveys and qualitative interviews with users and providers will be utilized to measure adoption. The Proctors implementation framework will be utilized to organize outcomes and to understand adoption of one-stop and quality improvement measures at the clinic and provider level. Investigators will comprehensively triangulate all data sources to understand how system, provider, and client factors interact to influence adoption.

PrEP continuation

Time Frame: up to 12 months of PrEP use.

PrEP continuation will determined by clinic visit attendance and pharmacy PrEP refills records obtained by abstraction of MOH clinic records.

Fidelity

Time Frame: Throughout the study period, up to 36 months

Fidelity will be defined as the degree to which one-stop pathway and quality improvement measures are implemented as planned. Checklists and technical assistant (TA) reports will be used to study how implementation of one-stop pathway and quality improvement measures are implemented per protocol at provider and clinic level. Investigators will comprehensively triangulate all data sources to understand how system, provider, and client factors interact to influence adoption.

Satisfaction with services

Time Frame: Throughout the study period, up to 36 months

Satisfaction will be defined ad fulfillment or happiness with one-stop service experience. Within the program we will use cross-sectional quantitative exit surveys administered to random clients at clinic to understand quality of care services and satisfaction with services.

PrEP adherence

Time Frame: Years 2-4 of the study, up to 36 months.

PrEP adherence will be measured objectively by quantification of drug levels in dried blood spots obtained at random subset visits from clients returning for PrEP refills.

Sustainability

Time Frame: up to 12 months after technical assistance support is scaled back

Sustainability will be defined as the number of clinics using one-stop at 6, 12 months after technical assistance (TA). Checklists and technical assistant reports will be used to document implementation of one-stop after technical assistance support is scaled back The Proctors implementation framework will be used to organize implementation outcomes. Investigators will comprehensively triangulate all data sources to understand how system, provider, and client factors interact to influence continuation of PrEP.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Incremental cost of one-stop PrEP services, including costs averted, and reduced client wait times.(up to 36 months.)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials