Nicotinic Enhancement of Cognitive Remediation Training in Schizophrenia

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Schizophrenia
Schizoaffective Disorder

Interventions: Behavioral: Cognitive remediation training
Drug: Nicotine polacrilex lozenge

Registration Number: NCT02069392

Lead Sponsor: University of Maryland, Baltimore

Brief Summary: Schizophrenia is marked by problems in attention, memory and problem solving. These deficits predict long-term functional outcome such as the ability to live independently and maintain employment, but they are not ameliorated by currently available medications. Cognitive training improves these functions to some degree, but this approach is time- and resource-intensive. The current project aims at enhancing and accelerating the benefits that people with schizophrenia derive from cognitive training by administering nicotine during some of the training sessions. This would provide the proof of principle for a type of treatment intervention to improve cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia.

The current project aims at determining whether the intermittent presence of nicotine during cognitive training exercises in people with schizophrenia will shorten the training period necessary to induce significant and clinically relevant improvement and enhance the improvement seen after a training period of specified length.

Hypothesis 1a: Nicotine administration during training will increase the size of all measured effects of the training intervention, and will accelerate the time course of performance enhancement on the MCCB and training exercise progression parameters.

Hypothesis 1b: The larger training effects in the Nicotine Group will persist beyond the end of the intervention.

Hypothesis 2a: Within-session progress on the training exercises will be larger in the presence of nicotine than in the presence of placebo.

Hypothesis 2b: These acute nicotine-induced performance elevations will persist beyond the presence of nicotine through subsequent non-drug training sessions, giving evidence of an acute facilitation of learning processes.

Detailed Description: Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 31

Inclusion Criteria

Aged 18-60 years.
DSM diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
Ability to give written informed consent.
Either currently smoking and not attempting to quit, or having smoked no more than 80 cigarettes, cigarillos or cigars in lifetime and not at all within the last year.
Normal or corrected to normal vision (at least 20/50).
Four weeks of stable pharmacological treatment (same psychiatric medication at same dose) and no foreseeable changes at enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria

Alcohol or substance abuse or dependence other than nicotine within the last 12 months.
Uncontrolled hypertension (resting systolic blood pressure above 150 or diastolic above 90 mm Hg).
History of myocardial infarction, heart failure, angina, stroke or severe arrhythmias.
ECG abnormalities.
History of neurological conditions such as stroke, seizures, dementia or organic brain syndrome.
Mental retardation.
Pregnant, verified by urine pregnancy test for females.
Breast-feeding.
Treated with benztropine currently or within the last four weeks.

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Cognitive remediation training with nicotine	Nicotine polacrilex lozenge	Participants will complete daily sessions of Posit Science cognitive remediation training for 10 weeks. Twice a week, participants will consume a 2 mg (for non-smokers) or 4 mg (for smokers) nicotine polacrilex lozenge prior to the training.
Cognitive remediation training without nicotine	Cognitive remediation training	Participants will complete daily Posit Science cognitive remediation training for 10 weeks. Twice a week, participants will consume a placebo lozenge prior to the training.
Cognitive remediation training with nicotine	Cognitive remediation training	Participants will complete daily sessions of Posit Science cognitive remediation training for 10 weeks. Twice a week, participants will consume a 2 mg (for non-smokers) or 4 mg (for smokers) nicotine polacrilex lozenge prior to the training.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite Score	baseline (week 0), weeks 4 and 7 of intervention, end-of-intervention (week 10), 4-week follow-up	The MCCB is an FDA-approved assessment tool for trials of cognition-enhancing treatments in people with schizophrenia. The MCCB is comprised of the following domains: 1) Speed of Processing; 2) Attention/Vigilance; 3) Working Memory; 4) Verbal Learning; 5) Visual Learning; 6) Reasoning and Problem Solving; and 7) Social Cognition. The composite score is standardized to a T-scale (mean=50, standard deviation=10) based on healthy control normative data. Better performance is reflected by higher scores.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Score	baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10)	Clinician rating scale to measure psychotic symptoms. Each of 20 items is scored 1-7. Total scores are the sum of all items and range from 20 to 140, with larger values reflecting worse symptoms.
UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) Score	baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 10)	Measures ability to perform real-life tasks by standardized role-play. Scores reflect percent correct, i.e. range from 0-100 with higher scores representing better performance.
Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) Score	baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 10)	Clinician-administered interview about daily life cognitive functioning. The CAI assesses 10 items related to working memory, attention/vigilance, learning/memory, problem solving, processing speed, and social cognition. The total score ranges from 1 (inability to maintain personal hygiene due to cognitive deficits) to 100 (superior cognitive functioning in a wide range of activities). A score of 55 corresponds to moderate cognitive symptoms, e.g. persistent problems paying attention or forgetting scheduled events.
Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Score	baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10)	Clinician rating scale of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Within each of 5 domains, separate symptoms are rated from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe). Total scores are the sum of 22 subscales and range from 0 to 110, with larger values reflecting higher negative symptoms.
Calgary Depression Scale Score	baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10)	Clinician scale developed to assess the level of depression in schizophrenia. 9 items assess symptoms of depression and overall rater impression on a scale from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).
Change in Abbreviated Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale Score	baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 10)	Semi-structured clinician interview measuring functional outcome and quality of life in people with schizophrenia. Includes subjective questions regarding life satisfaction and objective indicators of social and occupational role functioning during preceding 4 weeks. Seven items are scored on a 0 (severe impairment) to 6 (high functioning) scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 42, with larger values reflecting higher functioning.
Change in Working Memory Capacity	baseline (week 1) and post-intervention (week 10)	Derived from a computerized change localization task. One to four colored squares are shown for 100 ms. After a delay, they reappear and the task is to click on the one square that has changed color (50% chance). Performance is expressed as the percentage of correct responses.
Training Exercise Parameters: Visual and Sound Sweeps	baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10), 4-week follow-up	Some of the Posit Science exercises provide an assessment tool of training progress on task parameters, which adjust continuously to keep performance at \~85% correct. Enhanced sensory processing speed and precision is considered the central building block of training benefits. Therefore, we analyzed the two exercises aimed at training these processes. Performance is quantified as stimulus presentation time in ms of visual or sound "sweeps", which the participant has to judge in terms of change across space or time. Smaller values reflect better performance. Visual and sound sweeps were averaged.