Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01197248
NCT01197248CompletedPhase 2

Randomized Controlled Trial of Cystocele Plication Risks ("CPR Trial"): A Pilot Study

Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada0 sites40 target enrollmentStarted: February 1, 2009Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 2
Status
Completed
Enrollment
40
Primary Endpoint
Post operative voiding dysfunction

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Up to 50% of patients undergoing pelvic floor repair experience short-term postoperative voiding dysfunction, increasing the length of hospitalization, cost and anxiety among patients.

The mechanism behind this problem is the sutures placed in the pubocervical fascia during the cystocele repair. The cited benefit of bladder plication is greater cure of cystocele. The existence of pubocervical fascia and the need for placement of plicating sutures over the bladder have been questioned.

The objective of this study is to determine if avoiding cystocele plication in women undergoing surgery for cystocele decreases the need of catheterization beyond post operative day #2.

We will conduct a RCT of patients undergoing transvaginal repair of midline cystocele at the Mount Sinai Hospital. Patients will be randomized to receiving plicating sutures versus no plication. This procedure may be conducted with or without concomitant correction of other sites of prolapse. However, they will not have any procedures for correction of stress incontinence.

This study will be powered to detect a reduction in voiding dysfunction from 50% to 25% of patients. Using a χ2 distribution, and an alpha error of 0.05, the required sample size is 58 patients per group.

Detailed Description

Vaginal prolapse is a common problem in women. Approximately 11% of women undergo pelvic reconstructive surgery for either pelvic organ prolapse and/or urinary incontinence[1]. Several surgical techniques for correction of prolapse have evolved and have been scientifically evaluated. However, many basic surgical gynecological principles and techniques have been passed on over generations without any scientific evaluation. The technique of transvaginal repair of cystocele due to an anterior midline defect has traditionally included four steps: 1. mobilization of the defect (i.e. separation of vagina from bladder); 2. reduction of the defect (i.e. placement of plicating sutures into the pubocervical fascia); 3. trimming of redundant vaginal tissues; and 4. reapproximating the vaginal mucosa[2, 3]. Although each surgeon may modify any of these steps (ex. Depth of dissection, location and number of sutures), the principles are consistent. The existence of pubocervical fascia and the need for placement of plicating sutures over the bladder have been questioned, and some vaginal surgeons omit this step[4-6]. The cited benefit of bladder plication is greater cure of cystocele. Some of the potential risks of plication include ureteric obstruction, if the sutures are near the ureteric orifice, and voiding dysfunction if the sutures are near the urethrovesical junction[3, 7]. A chart review of patients at the Mount Sinai Hospital, who underwent typical pelvic floor repair, including transvaginal cystocele repair and mid-urethral sling, has shown that approximately 50% of patients experience short-term postoperative voiding dysfunction (non-published data), increasing the length of hospitalization, cost and anxiety among patients.

This pilot trial will assess the short-term risks of cystocele plication, and will assess trial feasibility. Ideally a larger subsequent trial will assess the cure of cystocele one year after surgery. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first study to assess the short-term post-operative outcomes in women who undergo this procedure.

3- Research Question In women with cystocele due to an anterior midline defect, does cystocele plication (independent variable) result in more or less patients requiring catheterization beyond postoperative day 2 (dependent variable) compared to no plication?

Hypothesis The hypothesis is that there may be more short-term voiding dysfunction and ureteric obstruction following cystocele repair with plication than following cystocele repair without plication.

4- Population of Interest and Sampling Methods Inclusion criteria: Patients between 18 and 75 years, who will undergo surgery at the Mount Sinai Hospital that includes cystocele repair, will be eligible.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients between 18 and 75 years, who will undergo surgery at the Mount Sinai Hospital that includes cystocele repair, will be eligible.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients will be excluded if the surgeon places anterior vaginal mesh or a mid-urethral sling, and/or if they had prior surgery for anterior vaginal wall prolapse and/or stress urinary incontinence.

Arms & Interventions

Cystocele Plication

Active Comparator

Placement of sutures over the pubocervical fascia during cystocele repair.

Intervention: Cystocele plication (Procedure)

No Plication

Experimental

Avoid sutures over pubocervical fascia during cystocele repair

Intervention: No Plication (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Post operative voiding dysfunction

Time Frame: 24 hours post intervention

The primary outcome variable will be the requirement for bladder catheterization beyond postoperative day 2

Secondary Outcomes

  • Ureteric Obstruction(Intraoperative)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Danny Lovatsis

Dr.

Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada

Similar Trials