跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07532200
NCT07532200招募中不适用

Association of SCN9A (Nav1.7) Gene Expression and Inflammatory Cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β) With the Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective Case-Control Study

Jamia Millia Islamia1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2026年4月10日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (IANB)

研究概览

简要总结

Voltage-gated sodium channels, especially Nav1.7 encoded by the SCN9A gene, are key regulators of nociceptive transmission. Upregulation of SCN9A has been associated with increased neuronal excitability and heightened pain perception. In parallel, inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) are known to sensitize peripheral nociceptors and reduce the efficacy of local anesthetics by modifying tissue environment and ion channel activity. However, the combined influence of SCN9A expression and inflammatory cytokines on anesthetic success in SIP has not been fully elucidated.

This prospective case-control study aims to evaluate the association between SCN9A gene expression and inflammatory cytokine levels with the clinical success of IANB in patients with SIP affecting mandibular molars. Approximately 90-100 patients will be recruited and categorized into two groups based on anesthetic outcome: successful anesthesia and failed anesthesia. All patients will receive a standardized IANB using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Anesthetic success will be determined based on the absence of pain during access cavity preparation and instrumentation.

Following access and pulp extirpation, pulpal tissue samples will be collected. SCN9A gene expression will be assessed using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), with relative expression calculated using the 2^-ΔΔCt method. Inflammatory cytokine levels (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β) will be quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

The primary outcome will be the difference in SCN9A expression between failed and successful anesthesia groups. Secondary outcomes will include comparison of cytokine levels and evaluation of correlations between SCN9A expression and inflammatory markers. Statistical analysis will include group comparisons, correlation analysis, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to assess the predictive value of these biomarkers.

详细描述

The present study is designed as a prospective case-control investigation to assess the association between SCN9A gene expression and levels of key inflammatory cytokines with the clinical success of IANB. A total of approximately 100 patients diagnosed with SIP in mandibular molars will be recruited and categorized into two groups based on anesthetic outcome: successful anesthesia and failed anesthesia. Standardized IANB will be administered using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, and anesthetic success will be determined based on absence of pain during access cavity preparation and instrumentation.

Following access cavity preparation and pulp extirpation, biological samples will be collected. Pulpal tissue samples will be used for RNA extraction and subsequent quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis to assess SCN9A gene expression. Relative expression levels will be calculated using the 2^-ΔΔCt method with appropriate housekeeping genes. In parallel, inflammatory cytokine levels (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β) will be quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) from pulpal tissue homogenates or gingival crevicular fluid, depending on feasibility.

The primary outcome of the study will be the difference in SCN9A expression between failed and successful anesthesia groups. Secondary outcomes will include comparison of cytokine levels between groups and evaluation of correlations between SCN9A expression and inflammatory markers. Data will be analyzed using appropriate statistical tests, including independent t-tests or non-parametric equivalents, correlation analysis, and logistic regression modeling. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis may be performed to assess the predictive value of these biomarkers for anesthetic failure.

This study aims to provide mechanistic insights into anesthetic failure in SIP by integrating molecular and inflammatory pathways. The findings may contribute to the development of predictive biomarkers and targeted therapeutic strategies to improve anesthetic success in endodontic practice.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 50 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients aged 18-60 years
  • Systemically healthy individuals (ASA I or II)
  • Presence of a mandibular first or second molar diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
  • Vital tooth confirmed by positive response to pulp sensibility tests (cold test/EPT)
  • Moderate to severe preoperative pain (Heft-Parker VAS)
  • Patients requiring endodontic treatment under inferior alveolar nerve block
  • Ability and willingness to provide informed consent

排除标准

  • Patients who have taken analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs, or antibiotics within the last 48 hours
  • Presence of systemic diseases affecting pain perception or inflammation (e.g., diabetes, neuropathic disorders)
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Teeth with periapical abscess, swelling, or sinus tract
  • Non-vital teeth or teeth with previous endodontic treatment
  • Patients with known allergy to local anesthetic agents
  • Patients with limited mouth opening or anatomical conditions affecting IANB administration
  • Inability to understand pain assessment scales or comply with study protocol

研究组 & 干预措施

IANB Success (Adequate Anesthesia) Group

This cohort will include patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars who achieve successful pulpal anesthesia following administration of a standardized inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Anesthetic success will be defined as the absence of pain (no or mild pain) during access cavity preparation and initial instrumentation without the need for any supplementary anesthetic techniques. Following confirmation of anesthesia, access cavity preparation and pulp extirpation will be performed, and pulpal tissue samples will be collected for analysis of SCN9A gene expression (RT-qPCR) and inflammatory cytokine levels (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β) using ELISA.

干预措施: Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (Procedure)

IANB Failure (Inadequate Anesthesia) Group

This cohort will include patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars who experience inadequate pulpal anesthesia following administration of a standardized inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Anesthetic failure will be defined as the presence of moderate to severe pain during access cavity preparation or instrumentation, necessitating the use of supplementary anesthetic techniques (e.g., intraligamentary or intrapulpal injections). Pulpal tissue samples will be collected after access cavity preparation and pulp extirpation for analysis of SCN9A gene expression (RT-qPCR) and inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β) using ELISA.

干预措施: Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block (IANB)

时间窗: Assessed 15 minutes after administration of IANB, during access cavity preparation and initial instrumentation at the same visit

The primary outcome will be the clinical success of the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB), assessed during endodontic access cavity preparation and initial instrumentation. Anesthetic success will be defined as the absence of pain or the presence of only mild pain that does not require any supplementary anesthetic intervention. Anesthetic failure will be defined as the presence of moderate to severe pain necessitating additional anesthesia (e.g., intraligamentary or intrapulpal injection).

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr. Vivek Aggarwal

Professor

Jamia Millia Islamia

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验