跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2021/12/038662
CTRI/2021/12/038662尚未招募不适用

Comparison of ultrasound guided Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane block versus Ultrasound guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment block for postoperative analgesia after femoral surgeries-A randamized control study

Bangalore Baptist Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2021年12月23日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
1)Efficacy of post operative analgesia(till 24hrs after shifting out from OT) as evaluated by numerical rating scale

研究概览

简要总结

This study aims to compare the effects of ultrasound-guided Lumbar erector spinae plane block versus ultrasound-guided Fascia iliaca Compartment block for postoperative analgesia following femur surgeries. The two groups will be assessed in terms of efficacy of analgesia, as measured by a standardized pain assessment score. The requirement of rescue analgesia in the first 24hours and proportions of patients who requires will also be assessed. Nausea , vomiting and  residual motor weakness in both the groups will be recorded. We want to know if the Lumbar Erector Spinae  block provides as good or better postoperative analgesia than the Fascia Iliaca Compartment block as part of a multimodal analgesia for femoral surgeries.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Computer generated randomization
盲法
Open Label

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 80.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • patient of ASA(American Society of Anesthesiologist) physical status 1,2,3 Elective and emergency femur surgeries.

排除标准

  • Refusal of consent for study Patient with bleeding or coagulation abnormalities or on therapeutic anticoagulants medications Infection or injury at the injection site Patients with significant preexisting neurological deficits, both central and peripheral Acute polytrauma cases Patient with history of allergy to local anesthetic/Diclofenac Hemodynamically unstable patients or those requiring postoperative ventilation.

结局指标

主要结局

1)Efficacy of post operative analgesia(till 24hrs after shifting out from OT) as evaluated by numerical rating scale

时间窗: 1)Efficacy of post operative analgesia(till 24 hrs after shifting out from OT) as evaluated by numerical rating scale | 2)Total rescue analgesia use(till 24 hrs after shifting out from OT) | 3)Proportion of patient who requires rescue analgesia

2)Total rescue analgesia use(till 24 hrs after shifting out from OT)

时间窗: 1)Efficacy of post operative analgesia(till 24 hrs after shifting out from OT) as evaluated by numerical rating scale | 2)Total rescue analgesia use(till 24 hrs after shifting out from OT) | 3)Proportion of patient who requires rescue analgesia

3)Proportion of patient who requires rescue analgesia

时间窗: 1)Efficacy of post operative analgesia(till 24 hrs after shifting out from OT) as evaluated by numerical rating scale | 2)Total rescue analgesia use(till 24 hrs after shifting out from OT) | 3)Proportion of patient who requires rescue analgesia

次要结局

  • 1)Incidence of any adverse events(2)Assessment of motor power in both groups)

研究者

申办方类型
Research institution and hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验