Study to compare between 2 types of nerve block to for relieve pain after bone surgery.

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue, (2) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical,

• Registration Number: CTRI/2021/12/038662
• Lead Sponsor: Bangalore Baptist Hospital

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the effects of ultrasound-guided Lumbar erector spinae plane block versus ultrasound-guided Fascia iliaca Compartment block for postoperative analgesia following femur surgeries. The two groups will be assessed in terms of efficacy of analgesia, as measured by a standardized pain assessment score. The requirement of rescue analgesia in the first 24hours and proportions of patients who requires will also be assessed. Nausea , vomiting and  residual motor weakness in both the groups will be recorded. We want to know if the Lumbar Erector Spinae  block provides as good or better postoperative analgesia than the Fascia Iliaca Compartment block as part of a multimodal analgesia for femoral surgeries.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Last Update Posted: 2021-12-13
• Study Start: 2021-12-23

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Not Yet Recruiting
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 60

Inclusion Criteria

patient of ASA(American Society of Anesthesiologist) physical status 1,2,3 Elective and emergency femur surgeries.

Exclusion Criteria

Refusal of consent for study Patient with bleeding or coagulation abnormalities or on therapeutic anticoagulants medications Infection or injury at the injection site Patients with significant preexisting neurological deficits, both central and peripheral Acute polytrauma cases Patient with history of allergy to local anesthetic/Diclofenac Hemodynamically unstable patients or those requiring postoperative ventilation.

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
1)Efficacy of post operative analgesia(till 24hrs after shifting out from OT) as evaluated by numerical rating scale	1)Efficacy of post operative analgesia(till 24 hrs after shifting out from OT) as evaluated by numerical rating scale | 2)Total rescue analgesia use(till 24 hrs after shifting out from OT) | 3)Proportion of patient who requires rescue analgesia
2)Total rescue analgesia use(till 24 hrs after shifting out from OT)	1)Efficacy of post operative analgesia(till 24 hrs after shifting out from OT) as evaluated by numerical rating scale | 2)Total rescue analgesia use(till 24 hrs after shifting out from OT) | 3)Proportion of patient who requires rescue analgesia
3)Proportion of patient who requires rescue analgesia	1)Efficacy of post operative analgesia(till 24 hrs after shifting out from OT) as evaluated by numerical rating scale | 2)Total rescue analgesia use(till 24 hrs after shifting out from OT) | 3)Proportion of patient who requires rescue analgesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
1)Incidence of any adverse events	2)Assessment of motor power in both groups

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Bangalore Baptist Hospital; 🇮🇳 Bangalore, KARNATAKA, India

Bangalore Baptist Hospital

🇮🇳Bangalore, KARNATAKA, India

RANJITHA K V

Principal investigator

9741614845

ranjithakv65@gmail.com