MedPath

Intrathecal Midazolam, Fentanyl and Nalbuphine as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Pain, Acute
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT04932083
Lead Sponsor
Benha University
Brief Summary

The main limitations of spinal anesthesia are its short duration of action and do not provide prolonged postoperative analgesia when it is performed only with local anesthetics. Adding adjuvants drugs to intrathecal local anesthetics improves quality and duration of spinal blockade, and prolongs postoperative analgesia. It is also possible to reduce dose of local anesthetics, as well as total amount of systemic postoperative analgesics.

Detailed Description

Several spinal adjuvants have been used to improve spinal anesthesia quality and to prolong postsurgical analgesia; Intrathecal opioids are the most commonly utilized. Intrathecal opioids cause analgesia by binding to opioid receptors in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. They prolong the duration of analgesia and allow early ambulation of patients.

Fentanyl, a short-acting lipophilic opioid, is known to augment the quality of subarachnoid block in many studies. However, worrisome adverse effects such as pruritus, urinary retention, post-operative vomiting, and respiratory depression limit the use of opioids.

Nalbuphine is a synthetic opioid with mixed agonist antagonist effect. It binds to both mu- and kappa receptors; binding of nalbuphine to mu receptors competitively displaces other mu-agonists from these receptors without any agonist activity, therefore decreasing the side effects on mu agonist (nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, urinary retention, pruritis, and prolonged sedation). While when binding to kappa receptors, nalbuphine has agonist effect (analgesic effect) through the kappa receptors distributed in the brain and spinal cord. There have been no documented studies of nalbuphine neurotoxicity.

Midazolam is a short acting benzodiazepine with anxiolytic, sedative, anticonvulsant and muscle relaxant effects, influencing GABA receptor and influence on neurons by entering chloride into them. It is water soluble in its acid formulation but is highly lipid soluble in vivo. It has been reported to have a spinally mediated anti-nociceptive effect. Previous studies have shown that intrathecal administration of midazolam added to bupivacaine improves the duration and quality of spinal anesthesia.

This study is carried out to evaluate and compare the effects of intrathecal midazolam (2 mg), fentanyl (25 micrograms) and nalbuphine (800 micrograms) as additives to intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5 %) with regards to: onset and duration of sensory block, onset and duration of motor block, duration of effective analgesia postoperative, side effects associated with the drug.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  1. ASA physical status I and ASA II
  2. Age from 18-40 years
  3. Scheduled to undergo elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. ASA physical status III or IV patients.
  2. Patients refuse spinal anesthesia.
  3. Patients physically dependent on narcotics or benzodiazepine.
  4. Patients with history of drug allergy to one of used adjuvants.
  5. Patients with gross spinal abnormality, localized skin sepsis, hemorrhagic diathesis or neurological involvement/ diseases and any contraindication for spine.
  6. Patients who are unable to communicate.
  7. Morbid obesity.
  8. Failure of spinal blockade.
  9. Complicated pregnancy.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
BupivacaineBupivacainepatients will receive 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (12.5 mg) plus 0.5 ml sterile water.
FentanylFentanylpatients will receive 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (12.5 mg) plus 0.5 ml fentanyl (25µg).
MidazolamMidazolampatients will receive 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (12.5 mg) plus 2mg of midazolam in 0.5 ml sterile water.
NalbuphineNalbuphinepatients will receive 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (12.5 mg) plus 0.8 mg nalbuphine hydrochloride in 0.5 ml sterile water.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Duration of effective analgesia24 hours postoperative

it is the time interval from the subarachnoid block to the first analgesic intervention (VAS \>3)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The onset of sensory block:2 minutes for ten minutes, every 5 minutes for the next 20 minutes after intrathecal injection

it is the time from end of intrathecal injection to absence of pain at T5 dermatome.

Onset of complete motor blockadeevery 2 minutes for 10 minutes after intrathecal injection

it is the time per minutes from intrathecal injection until Bromage scale to be 3.

Duration of motor block:6 hours postoperative

it is the time per minutes from intrathecal injection until Bromage score 0.

Duration of complete sensory block:12 hours postoperative

it is the time interval from the subarachnoid block to the first sensation of pain (VAS \>0).

Total dose of analgesic consumption24 hours postoperative

if VAS pain score \>3, intravenous 30 mg keterolac will be administered and can be repeated after 6 h if needed. If the mother was still complaining of pain or the VAS is still greater than 3 after 20 min from ketorolac injection, she will be given intravenous pethidine in a dose of 0.5 mg/kg.

Maternal adverse effects24 hours postoperative

All mothers will be monitored for the associated adverse effects such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), sedation, pruritus, hypotension, bradycardia, shivering, and respiratory depression.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Samar Rafik Amin

🇪🇬

Banhā, Qalubia, Egypt

Samar Rafik Amin
🇪🇬Banhā, Qalubia, Egypt
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath