COMPARISON OF IMPLANT INSTALLATION USING THE TRANSCRESTAL APPROACH WITH OSSEODENSIFICATION OR THE LATERAL WINDOW TECHNIQUE WITH SINUS LIFT: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 38
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Pain level
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This study will compare patient-reported outcomes, as well as the type and incidence of complications, and bone marginal loss after 12 months in implants installed using the transcrestal approach (tSFE) with an osseodensification system (performed according to the protocol by Huwais et al. 2018), or installed simultaneously using the lateral window technique (lSFE) with sinus lift. A blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial will be carried out with individuals over 18 years old, and with single tooth loss in the posterior maxilla, where the residual bone height (RBH) is 3 to 5 mm. The tSFE will be performed with osseodensification burs (Densa Bur, Versah, USA) using a counterclockwise motion, associated to synthetic biomaterial (hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate). The lSFE technique will require the sinus to be filled with the same biomaterial as the group using the other technique, and the antrostomy to be covered with a polydioxanone-based membrane. The patient's post-operatory perceptions will be evaluated by self-administered questionnaires quantifying social and professional isolation, physical appearance, duration and changes in quality of life, eating and speech, diet variations, and sleep deficiency for 2 weeks after the procedure. Pain will be assessed with the visual analogue scale (VAS). Immediately after prosthetic rehabilitation, cone beam tomography will be performed. Controls at 6 and 12 months will be performed. In these images, the marginal bone level in relation to a fixed reference point on the implants (upper part of the platform) will be measured mesially and distally in each implant, using a specific program (ImageJ - version 1.49v / NIH software - Bethesda, MD, USA). Generalized estimating equations will be used to compare the two treatments overtime. The significance level used will be 0.05.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Single (Investigator)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Maxillary sinuses that have residual bone height between at least 3 mm and 5 mm;
- •Width of the residual bone ridge that allows the insertion of an implant with a diameter of 4 mm;
- •Tomographic thickness of Schneider's membrane with a maximum of 5 mm in the region to be operated;
- •Residual ridge with ≥2 mm of medullary bone in the bucco-palatal direction, with a 1/1 ratio of medullary and cortical bone to achieve predictable plastic expansion;
- •Patients with adequate interarch space for placement of the prosthetic crown;
- •Good physical health status (ASA1 and ASA2, according to the Physical Status Classification System - American Society of Anesthesiologists);
- •At least 6 months since the last tooth loss in the region to be operated;
Exclusion Criteria
- •- Those with sinus pathology;
- •Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes a day);
- •Those with a history of head and neck radiotherapy;
- •Those who have already undergone bone augmentation in any of the targeted surgical areas;
- •Immunodeficiency of any nature;
- •Emotional instability and psychiatric problems;
- •Pregnancy;
- •Current use of oral bisphosphonates or history of using injectable bisphosphonate;
- •Patients with active periodontitis defined by the presence of subgingival bleeding greater than 10%;
- •Documented allergy to drugs or dental materials involved in the experimental protocol.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Pain level
Time Frame: day 14
visual analogue scale (VAS), ranging from "0 - no pain" to "100 - worst
Secondary Outcomes
- Medication Diary (number of doses of Ibuprofen 600mg)(day 14)
Investigators
Alex Nogueira Haas
Professor
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul