MedPath

Validation of Visual Analog Scales to Measure SatisfactiOn and WELL-being at Work (SoWell-VAS)

Recruiting
Conditions
Validation
Visual Analogue Scale
Occupational Stress
Registration Number
NCT05871411
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Brief Summary

We spend a third of our life at work. Psychosocial risks (PSR) are a major issue in occupational health 1. Approaching the different dimensions of PSR calls on a dozen essential components: workload, autonomy, social support, burnout, anxiety, efforts made, rewards, work addiction, investment, etc. a specific questionnaire which usually contains 20 to 30 questions, so that having an overall view of PSR using the current reference questionnaires (Karasek, Siegrist, etc.) represents a total of more than 300 questions. The response time is thus incompatible with current medical practice (passage in the waiting room before the occupational health medical examination) and leads to a majority of non-responses during anonymous questionnaires on the Internet. On the other hand, these validated questionnaires were carried out by different people and are very heterogeneous between them, including in their formulation, so that the respondents have the impression of disorganization and anarchy. There is therefore a need for short, quick and uniform questionnaires. EVAs offer the incredible advantage of meeting these criteria: speed, uniformity, precision. From a data analysis point of view, EVAs also have the advantage of offering a continuous quantitative response, allowing the use of all statistical approaches. If some questionnaires have already been validated in the form of EVA, such as the EVA stress versus the " Perceived Stress Scale " questionnaire (PSS), the EVA workload and EVA autonomy at work versus the Karasek questionnaire, the other reference questionnaires are not yet validated in EVA (burnout, anxiety, efforts / rewards, work addiction, etc.).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  • All voluntary adults with a professional activity.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Minor
  • Person not volunteer to participate.
  • Protected adults (curatorship, guardianship, safeguard of justice)

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
AnxietyOne week later

Anxiety using Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaire. is a self-reported questionnaire composed of 14 items with a 4-point Likert scale assessing anxiety (7 items) and/or depressive (7 items) symptoms. For each subscale (anxiety and depression), total score ranges from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety or depressive symptoms. A score from 0 to 7 indicates the absence of disease, a score of 8-10 represents doubtful cases, and scores higher than 11 reflects the presence of a mood disorder.

Job demandOne week later

Job demand on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

Social supportOne week later

Social support on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

Job demand / job control / social supportOne week later

Job demand / job control / social support using the Job Demand-Control-Support (JDSC) questionnaire of Karasek. JDSC assessed job demands, job control and social support through 26 items. The questionnaire measures nine items of job demands, nine items of job control and eight items of social support. Items of JDSC are scored on a four-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree. Among the 26 items, five negative statements require reverse scoring. From French data, the job strain threshold is set for a demands score higher than 20 and a control score lower than 71; the isostrain threshold is determined from a combining score of job strain and social support lower than 24.questionnaire of Karasek

BurnoutOne week later

Burnout using the Maslach Burn-out Inventory (MBI) questionnaire. MBI is composed of 22 items designed to assess the three components of the burn-out syndrome: emotional exhaustion (9 items), depersonalization (5 items) and reduced personal accomplishment (8 items). The items are written in the form of statements about personal feelings or attitudes. Items are made of a 7-point scale frequency of feelings, varying from "never" to "every day". The scores for each component of the burn-out syndrome are considered separately and are not combined into a single total score. If desired for participant feedback, each score can be coded as low, average, or high

Job controlOne week later

Job control on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

Work addictionOne week later

Work addiction using Work Addiction Risk Test (WART) questionnaire. The WART assesses 25 statements on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 - never true to 4 - always true. The total score ranged from 25 to 100, with higher scores reflecting higher work addiction. Scores from 25 to 56 were defined as low-risk of work addiction; from 57 to 66 as medium-risk and from 67 to 100 as high-risk .

Life satisfactionOne week later

Life satisfaction using the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ). MSQ is composed of 20 items designed to measure employee job satisfaction. Items are made of a 5-point scale of satisfaction, varying from 1 "Very dissatisfied" to 5 "Very satisfied". A percentile score of 75 or higher represent a high degree of satisfaction, a percentile score of 25 or lower represent a low degree of satisfaction and scores in the middle range of percentiles (26 to 74) indicated average satisfaction.

Effort-reward imbalanceOne week later

Effort-reward imbalance using Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire (ERI). ERI assessed psychological distress and health problems that may occur when there is an imbalance between the efforts required by the work and the rewards received. We used the 46 items of the French version of the ERI model exploring efforts (six items), over commitment (eleven items), and rewards (seventeen items). Items of ERI were scored on a five-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 = disagree to 5 = agree and very disturbed. A ratio extrinsic efforts and rewards can assess the imbalance between these two dimensions. A ratio greater than one defines employees exposed to an imbalance between efforts and rewards

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Work hours per weekOnce at inclusion

Number of hours worked per week

SociodemographicOnce at inclusion

age, gender, marital status, number of children, education level

Tabacco consumptionOnce at inclusion

Number of cigarettes per day

Stress at workOnce at inclusion

stress at work level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

Alcohol consumptionOnce at inclusion

Number of alcoholic drinks per week

HeightOnce at inclusion

Height in cm

Physical activityOnce at inclusion

Number of hours of physical activity per day

OccupationOnce at inclusion

Question "What is your profession?"

Ethical conflictsOnce at inclusion

Ethical conflicts confrontation on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from never (0) to often(100)

Night and weekend workOnce at inclusion

Do you work at night? Do you work weekends?

WeightOnce at inclusion

Weight in kg

Sedentary behaviorOnce at inclusion

Number of hours sit per day

Perceived healthOnce at inclusion

Perceived health on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from bad(0) to excellent (100)

Stress at homeOnce at inclusion

stress at home level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

FatigueOnce at inclusion

Fatigue level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from minimum (0) to maximum (100)

Sleep qualityOnce at inclusion

Sleep quality level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from bad(0) to excellent (100)

MoodOnce at inclusion

mood level on a horizontal, non-calibrated line of 100 mm, ranging from bad(0) to excellent (100)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

CHU clermont-ferrand

🇫🇷

Clermont-Ferrand, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath