Necessity of Transnasal Gastroscopy in Routine Diagnostics - a Patient Centered Requirement Analysis
- Conditions
- Patient Safety
- Interventions
- Procedure: Oral Gastroscopy, unsedatedProcedure: Oral Gastroscopy, sedatedProcedure: Nasal GastroscopyProcedure: Oral Gastroscopy with transnasal endoscope, sedated
- Registration Number
- NCT03663491
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Leipzig
- Brief Summary
Evaluation of patients safety and comfort in nasal endoscopy.
- Detailed Description
Introduction: Numerous indications require regular outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (EGD). In most cases, peroral gastroscopy is performed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the necessity and outpatients' demand for transnasal gastroscopy (nEGD).
Methods: A questionnaire was used to assess patients' choice of method, previous experience, psychological and sociodemographic data. Furthermore, the patients' satisfaction with and potentially perceived discomfort during the examination as well as their preference for a method with regard to future examinations was evaluated.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 283
- Informed consent
- Adequate knowledge of oral and written german
- Inpatient Treatment
- For medical reasons (narrow nasal cavity, band ligation of esophageal varices, Placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, planned colonoscopy under sedation the same day, abnormal coagulation, emergency procedures)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Unsedated Nasal Gastroscopy Oral Gastroscopy with transnasal endoscope, sedated Transnasal Endoscopy. No sedation used. Use of local anesthesia. Oral Gastroscopy, unsedated Oral Gastroscopy, unsedated Transoral Endoscopy. No sedation used. Use of local anesthesia. Oral Gastroscopy, sedated Oral Gastroscopy, sedated Transoral Endoscopy. Intravenous sedation used. Unsedated Nasal Gastroscopy Nasal Gastroscopy Transnasal Endoscopy. No sedation used. Use of local anesthesia.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patients satisfaction (pain, discomfort, experience) During Endoscopy procedure Satisfaction with the procedure:
* not at all
* hardly
* moderately
* quite
* extraordinarily
(extraordinarily = the best possible outcome, not at all = the worst possible outcome)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Previous experience with endoscopy Before Endoscopy procedure Experience:
Have you had a gastroscopy:
Yes or No
If Yes, how was your gastroscopy:
* pleasant
* slightly unpleasant
* very unpleasantPain during the procedure During Endoscopy procedure Nose pain Numeric Rating Scale 1-10 (1 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
Throat pain Numeric Rating Scale 1-10 (1 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
Gag Reflex:
Yes or No
Abdominal pain:
Numeric Rating Scale 1-10 (1 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Leipzig
🇩🇪Leipzig, Germany