Emergency Small vs Large Tube Thoracostomy in Chest Trauma Patients.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 100
- 主要终点
- To compare the number of patients who will have emergent small sized tube thoracostomy and large sized tube thoracostomy regarding the need for another chest tube.
研究概览
简要总结
To compare between small sized tube thoracostomy and large sized tube thoracostomy regarding the need for another chest tube for the fear of obstruction (in hemomothorax) or ineffective drainage (in hemothorax, pneumothorax or hemo-pneumothorax) ,pain score or repositioning and need for thoracotomy.
详细描述
To evacuate abnormal fluid and air, chest tubes are placed in the pleural space, either surgically or percutaneously. Therapeutic drainage of pleural conditions such as pneumothorax, hemothorax, empyema, chylothorax, and malignant effusions, as well as prophylaxis drainage of air, blood, and other fluids after chest surgery are the indications for chest tubes.
Closed water-seal chest drainage has been described in 1875 by Gotthard Bülau to treat an empyema, as an alternative to the standard rib resection and open tube drainage in the acute phase or rib excision (saucerization) in the chronic phase.
Bülau emphasized the necessity of negative intrapleural pressure for re-expansion of a collapsed lung in the setting of thoracic empyema although most surgeons in his time attributed deaths from thoracic empyema to infection and not superimposed respiratory compromise due to open pneumothorax .
He understood that closed water seal drainage could facilitate lung re-expansion via the patient's natural respiratory movements. Unfortunately, until mechanical ventilation was introduced, application of these principles was limited to the treatment of thoracic empyema.
During both the Second World War and the Korean one lung function restoration was the primary goal of thoracic wound treatment: emergency tube thoracostomy became extremely frequent in haemothorax and tension pneumothorax treatment. For the first time the drain was connected to a two-bottle water seal suction system since 1952 , synthetic ones, more flexible and easy to place, replaced metal tubes and modern three chamber thoracic drain, for a more efficient suction, were employed. New, flexible and plastic drains were widely used by the 1980s, they ranged between 6 and 40 French (F) in size. Since it was believed that smaller drains were less effective in adult medicine, being more prone to the risk of obstruction, the smaller ones (≤20 F) were commonly used in children, the bigger in adults,. In the last two decades, small-bore chest tubes (SBCT) have gained increasing popularity In traumatic pneumothorax or hemothorax the optimal tube size for an emergent thoracostomy is unknown. For the nonemergent management of patients with traumatic pneumothorax or hemothorax both small catheter tube thoracostomy and large-bore chest tube thoracostomy have been shown to work.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •all chest trauma patients with significant hemothorax, pneumothorax or combined hemo-pneumothorax
排除标准
- •any chest trauma patients undergoing thoracotomy or thoracic surgery for any other reason for example : diaphragmatic tear,flail chest or sternal fracture
结局指标
主要结局
To compare the number of patients who will have emergent small sized tube thoracostomy and large sized tube thoracostomy regarding the need for another chest tube.
时间窗: baseline
To compare the number of patients who will have emergent small sized tube thoracostomy and large sized tube thoracostomy regarding the need for another chest tube.
次要结局
- Number of trauma patients who will have emergent small vs large thoracostomy tube regarding pain score(baseline)
- Number of trauma patients who will have emergent small vs large thoracostomy tube regarding duration of tube insertion.(baseline)
研究者
Amr Mohamed Mamdouh Hussein
resident
Assiut University
