Effectiveness of the online Hold me Tight course
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Relationship problems
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON22153
- Lead Sponsor
- one.
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 50
Inclusion Criteria
Being a partner in a couple relationship.
Exclusion Criteria
no exclusion criteria because partners refer themselves to this online programm
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Relationship Satisfaction measured with the 4-item version of the Couple Satisfaction Index (CSI-4; Funk & Rogge, 2007). Previously a Cronbach’s alfa of .93 was reported (Doss et al., 2017).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Attachment with the partner. The Experiences in Close Relationships Relationship Structure questionnaire for partners (ECR-RS; Fraley et al., 2011) measures adult attachment in the current romantic relationships. It contains 9 items and 2 subscales with Cronbach’s a’s of .85 and .84.<br><br>Relationship Dynamics will be assessed with 4 item version of the Relationship Dynamics Scale (RDS; Stanley & Markman, 1997). The RDS converges with other comparable constructs (Stanley et al., 2005).<br><br>Separation potential measured with a shortened 3-item version of the Marital Instability Index (MI; Edwards et al., 1987). The questionnaire was used by Doss et al. (2020) who reported a Cronbach’s a of .83.