Safety and Effectiveness of Infliximab in Slovakia When Used for Rheumatoid Arthritis (Study P04741)(COMPLETED)
- Registration Number
- NCT00724243
- Lead Sponsor
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Brief Summary
This study will gather information on the safety and efficacy of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are starting treatment with infliximab for the first time. Patients will be treated in the usual manner according to local guidelines and normal clinical practice.
- Detailed Description
Local patients, diagnosed with RA at the National Institute of Rheumatic Diseases, Piestany, Slovakia, can participate, if their physicians have decided to treat the patient with infliximab. Registration for the trial will be done on a voluntary basis.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 33
- Subject must have been given patient leaflet,
- Subject must not have ever received infliximab at the time of registration,
- Subject must be a good candidate for infliximab as per Summary of Product Characteristics
- Subject must sign the approved consent form
- None
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Slovakia Infliximab Rheumatoid arthritis patients in Slovakia who are starting treatment with infliximab for the first time, in accordance with normal clinical practice.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Average Change in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) From the Beginning of the Treatment Baseline, Week 14, and Week 54 The DAS 28 is an assessment of disease activity based on swollen joint count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and general health. Participants can be scored on a range of 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating less disease activity.
Number of Participants Fulfilling Criteria for a Therapeutic Response According to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Criteria Week 14 and Week 54 Response to treatment was assessed by EULAR response criteria. According to these criteria, participants were characterized as good, moderate, or non-responders based on both DAS level attained and change in DAS. Good response was defined as \>1.2 improvement in DAS from Baseline and DAS attained during follow-up of ≤2.4. Non-responders were participants with improvement of ≤0.6 or participants with improvement of \>0.6 but ≤1.2 and DAS attained during follow-up of \>3.7. Remaining participants were classified as moderate. Scores of good and moderate were considered to have therapeutic response.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method